The Smarts had their own Gaspar statement

The Smarts have made sure the alleged abduction of Elizabeth's trial remains in Utah, why, because it is there where Ed Smart has his strength , his power and the mighty support of the Mormon Church.

Before Elizabeth, ranaway, a scandal was about to break. A newspaper called The Enquirer dared to print a story that no one else would touch. The same way we long  to find a newspaper with balls large enough,  to print the Gaspar statement.

During the Elizabeth Smart investigation, the National Enquirer printed a story with the following headline: “Utah Cops: Secret Diary Exposes Family Sex Ring,” and alleged that the three Smart brothers “Ed, Tom, and David were involved in homosexual activity that their wives knew about”

The National Enquirer is known for its absurd stories that the general public don’t question as being completely false advertising. However, residents of Salt Lake were so upset by the story that they turned editions around or had stores pull them from the stands. In addition, after Elizabeth was found the Smarts threatened to sue the National Enquirer if it didn’t retract its statement, which it then did.

 Even though male homosexuality would have had nothing to do with the disappearance of a daughter or niece, for the Smart brothers to be part of a sex ring would discredit not only their position in the Mormon faith but would somehow discredit their innocence in the face of Smart’s kidnapping—The thought of aberrant sexuality, in any form, points to the perceived savagery in human nature and the fine line between Us and Other.

----------------------------------

However, residents of Salt Lake were so upset by the story that they turned editions around or had stores pull them from the stands.

 ..........discredit their innocence in the face of Smart’s kidnapping—The thought of aberrant sexuality, in any form, points to the perceived savagery in human nature and the fine line between Us and Other.

------------------------

This is why the McCanns cannot afford for the Gaspar statement to be out there , it matters not if it is true or false... as it states here....sexuality, in any form, points to the perceived savagery in human nature, it would also discredit the McCanns in their innocence in the face of Madeleines alleged kidnapping.

However, the Smarts asking for a retraction does not mean the story was not true. The Smarts themselves have never denied it and Tom when questioned said 'I do not know what my brothers have done to each other.'

McCanns no more 'The Darlings ' of the Media

I have been evaluating the peoples reaction of this latest stunt by the McCanns, Monday April 28th 2008, the parents announced they were going to write a million pound best seller., for the very same reason they give today, the fund is running dry. The book was to be be called 'Our year of hell' not Madeleines year of hell, but their's, not sure what happened to the book, shelved maybe, (no pun intended).

Today , while it is true ,every newspaper has mentioned the parents and their book, without a thought for Dr.Amarals (the parents do not want that out there). The McCanns no longer make headline news, they are way down the tabloids, tucked almost out of sight, an embarrassement. Two weeks ago it was their new German website, the petition and the begging bowl, from the now, (if reading the comments sections are anything to go by)  not so gullible public, seem to have wisened up and lets face it ,the McCanns are not liked, they have always had an air of snootiness about them, cold and hard.  Kate, even when she tried , could not give out any vibes she had a clue what it meant to be a mother, not her fault, she is like her own mother. Susan Healy,  also comes across as cold and distant, neither seem to have a maternal bone between them. Gerry likes to think of himself as a politician, he loves to hear the sound of his own voice and is unaware everyone is so very,very bored with him, yet on and on he drones in complete oblivion.

The boring McCanns, what will they do  next week to keep themselves in the news, a movie deal ?and who will play the part of unlikeable Kate and boring Gerry ? the stars will be lining up and the chosen two names kept secret, Clarence Mitchell will inform the press as we giggle behind our keyboards. The McCanns trying to come to terms, must struggle with reality as they find their celeb status is no more  .  The McCanns , well past their sell by date should really go back to Portugal and ask for the case to be re-opened but they won't  because they cannot, and they cannot for the simply reason they know exactly what happened to Madeleine and the 'situation she now finds herself in'

Here is an article from 2007, when Kate McCann was finger pointing along with her friends to put Robert Murat in the frame. May 2007 when the McCanns could do no wrong but inside they were as rotten as a decaying cabbage, we were just too blind to see it, or at least I was.

Trial by innuendo of the worst kind

Camilla Cavendish. 17 May 2007

The media are not helping the McCanns

My friend Lil is about to take her children on holiday to Madeira. “But I won’t be able to stop thinking about . . . you know” she says sheepishly. “I should think we’ll be eating with them in the restaurant every night”. I’m sure that many parents are feeling the same. The long, dread wait for news of Madeleine McCann has gripped us for almost two weeks. But that has become a problem.

This girl’s looks, her middle-class origins, her parents’ fear and frustration, having to deal with authorities in another language, make so many people feel that “it could have been us”. But our very concern, our desire to know every detail, risks ruining yet more lives. For the press pack in Praia da Luz has turned the story all too rapidly into “it must be him”. Robert Murat’s face has featured in almost every news bulletin and paper for the past 48 hours. But it is not remotely clear that he had anything to do with it.

The earliest TV broadcasts claimed that Mr Murat had been “arrested”. Had this been true, some coverage was inevitable. The British press long ago ceased to have any respect for the Contempt of Court Act, which instructs journalists not to prejudice a fair trial. (It is astonishing that we have been allowed to get away with this.) But it soon turned out that Mr Murat had not been arrested. He was a “suspect”, but had not been charged. As the hours wore on, it became glaringly apparent that there was precious little evidence against him.

That did not stop the bandwagon rolling. Not at all. We learnt yesterday that Mr Murat “was always on the bouncy castle” at work events. Must be a monster, then. Picture editors picked the oddest shots they could find, and proceeded to pronounce solemnly on how weird he looked – although he didn’t look weird to me, just harassed.

I began to feel as though I was watching Arthur Miller’s The Crucible when Lori Campbell of the Sunday Mirror was interviewed about why she had tipped off the police. “I found him to be creepy,” she said of Mr Murat. “When he was talking to me he was vague about his background.”

Ms Campbell may emerge as a heroine, a quick-witted journalist with a gut instinct for something the police had overlooked. Or she may not. She was absolutely right to tell police of her suspicions. But she was surely wrong to publicise them. Even if Mr Murat does turn out to be guilty, it does not help the investigation one jot for you and me to know his name right now. If he is innocent, he has been damaged for life. I think he meant it literally when he said that “the only way I will survive is if they catch Madeleine’s abductor”. In the twisted way of these things his denial, too, has become a story.

You can see how it has happened.

The public fascination is overwhelming. Madeleine has featured on the Today programme as often as in the redtop press. Her parents have asked for media coverage to keep up pressure on the authorities. And the Soham murders are still horribly fresh in journalists’ minds. Ian Huntley was a loner who hung around at the scene offering help to the press. So hardly anyone seems prepared to entertain the possibility that Mr Murat, as a bilingual neighbour, might have been sincere.

This is trial by innuendo of the worst kind. There was absolutely no reason to name this man; the Portuguese police still have not. The Times removed its photo of Mr Murat from the front page halfway through the night on Monday, replacing it with one of his mother’s front door, as editors agonised over whether there was a shred of evidence that he did it. But he remained on page three. The Daily Telegraph the next day chose to picture all three people who have been questioned by Portuguese police on its front page: Mr Murat, his alleged girlfriend and her estranged husband. Hey, they all knew each other. They were probably the same people who were seen together at a petrol station on the night of the abduction.

Wow, they must be guilty!

Differences between Britain and Portugal do not excuse the jump to conclusions. It is true that the Portuguese will seek more evidence before making an arrest than would be the case in Britain. But the Portuguese police have been ridiculed by a British press infuriated by their refusal to confirm or deny anything. Portuguese law forbids the police from making public any significant details of an investigation while inquiries are under way precisely in order to protect suspects from the kind of ordeal Mr Murat has suffered. It would be simply appalling if a judge was later to decide that he could not be tried.

It is not only because the story is abroad that the press feels uninhibited. Our treatment of Mr Murat echoes that of Tom Stephens, the first man to be named as a suspect by police investigating the murders of five women in Ipswich last year. He too had originally approached the press, which splashed the weirdest-looking pictures of him they could find. A week later a completely different man was charged with all five crimes.

There is another point. In cases of this type, if abductors fear capture, they panic and kill. We cannot know if the wanton press coverage is limiting the police’s chances of bringing Madeleine to safety. If any of the three people pictured in The Telegraph is guilty, he or she will now feel cornered. What then?

We all long for a happy ending. But our desire to be reassured that everything possible is being done should not take precedence over the truth. Mr and Mrs McCann seem to be holding their nerve a lot better than the British press. And they have much, much more at stake. Which is everything.

What matters is to find this poor girl, not to indulge in sensationalist speculation that could do untold harm

What kind of mother is Susan Healy?

Quote from Susan Healy

“I think, now, we have done all that and, somehow, there’s nothing to protect you and you are thinking constantly about Madeleine and her situation. And there’s a fear, I suppose, that people will accept that Madeleine has gone.”


Quote from Gerry McCann

'Madeleine and the situation she finds herself in'

Susan Healy knows her daughter is a liar but she stands by her for the simple reason she is her daughter. Madeleine was her first grandchild , you would think she would want Madeleine to have a place where she could visit and take flowers. Susan Healy is happy for her daughter to continue the lie for as long as it takes, we already know they have eighteen years in mind thanks to Jaycee.....maybe Madeleine will also return home with great grandchildren for Susan Healy, born from a rapist who has raped Madeleine since the age of three. Kate has said 'it is not a pleasant thought' but......yes Kate 'but', it is not going to happen is it ? thank God , Madeleine did not go through the hell of Jaycee. Susan Healy is at peace because she knows Madeleine is at peace and her daughter is not in prison which is her rightful place, so for Susan Healy all is right with the world. What kind of mother does that make her ? I have no idea, certainly not the kind of mother I would want.

Kate and Gerry Pinocchio

When you think they can sink no lower, they manage to shock the world. The McCanns have only ever wanted money and at last Kate McCann has spoken the truth, she is writing a novel for the money. Kate has no interest in laying the remains of her child to rest , her only desire, to become a celebrity and sign her name in a  book of lies to sell to the gullible few, who still believe.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5rbRg5Beb4

BBC still snubbing Dr.Amarals' The truth of the Lie.'

The parents, still the only suspects in the disappearance of their missing daughter. Gerry McCann the last one to see her alive, or dead ,to now write a book of fiction. I would imagine Gerry will be looking over his 'alleged deleted' blogs to remind him of what he said. The McCanns in the eyes of the law because they have not been charged 'are innocent' it is a hard pill to swallow(remember OJ Simpson) when you know they are guilty and  committing fraud.

The BBC do not mention Dr.Amarals book . BBC yet to apologise for the disgraceful 'arse licker'friend of Gerry McCann 'Mike O'Sullivan'. Not one journalist it seems with a brain cell between them asking the McCanns the million dollar question ' How can you possibly know we will not have heard something about Madeleine or her whereabouts before Spring?'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11754319

http://www.booksattransworld.co.uk/

Books at Transworld....Humour...Fantasy and Science Fiction.....Good choice...The McCanns will be right at home.

2008: McCanns to write 'Year of hell book'

Daily Mail Sun 27th April 2008

Kate and Gerry McCann are to write a book about their 'year of hell'
without missing daughter Madeleine, it was revealed yesterday.

The couple could make up to £1million in a deal for a tell-all memoir
about Madeleine's disappearance and their eight months as police
suspects.

Several publishers have approached them amid intense interest in the
year-long case, sparking the possibility of a bidding frenzy for the
book.

The couple's spokesman Clarence Mitchell said they wanted to raise
money for the dwindling Find Madeleine appeal fund, and to counter a
campaign of smears from inside the police investigation.

Last week it emerged that the former head of the Madeleine
investigation, Goncalo Amaral, has written a book about the case, with
the working title 'The Truth of the Lie'.

Insiders said it would contain explosive details about the police
inquiry and the decision to name the McCanns as suspects, or
arguidos.

Mr Mitchell confirmed that Mr McCann, 39, had met with one publishing
house and had been approached by several others.

He insisted any money raised by a book would go to the Find Madeleine
fund, and not to the McCanns themselves.

Mr Mitchell said: 'A number of publishers have approached us, as have
some authors, but no deal has been done.

'The idea of writing an official book at some point is appealing. It's
a legitimate way of raising money for the fund but would also give
them a chance to put across their side of the story, and to talk about
some of the wider issues.'

The McCanns have considered a series of lucrative deals to fund their
continuing search for their missing daughter, who disappeared from
their holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal, almost a year ago.

Madeleine, then three, was left alone with her two-year-old twin
brother and sister while their parents went out for dinner nearby with
friends.

They suffered a public backlash after it emerged that their
representatives had begun negotiations with the world's largest
entertainment agency, IMG, over selling the film rights to their
story, and discussed bids from Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters in
the U.S. for their first major chatshow appearance.

Mr and Mrs McCann, of Rothley, Leicestershire, remain desperate to
raise money for the Find Madeleine fund amid fears that the
£1.2million raised from public donations will run out within months.

The independent television production company Mentorn Media made a
£10,000 donation to the fund in return for the couple's cooperation
with a two-hour documentary, due to be shown on ITV1 on Wednesday
night.

In the film Mrs McCann, 40, spoke of her renewed hope that her oldest
daughter was still alive but admitted that on some days she was
'desperate' and considered giving up.

She said: 'You have days when you're so down and desperate and tired,
you think you've got to switch off and I think, okay, we've tried
really hard and we've come up with nothing and now we need to make the
best of what we've got.

'(But) we're never going to hit that day. It doesn't matter how small
the possibility is (of Madeleine being found alive), the possibility
is still there.'

She added: 'There were many moments where we hit rock bottom and
sobbed, wondering how we could survive without knowing where our
little girl was.

'It is pure torture to deal with and it has been a long year of hell.
But what keeps us going is our overwhelming faith that Madeleine is
alive and will come home.'

Mrs McCann, a former GP, told how her twins Sean and Amelie, now
three, used their toy phones to try to 'call' Madeleine and play games
where they try to find her.

Mr Mitchell said the couple were 'daunted' by the approaching
anniversary on Saturday and the publicity surrounding it, but wanted
to use it as a chance to 're-energise' the search for their missing
daughter.

He said their detective agency Metodo 3 continued to receive leads
from all over the world and the McCanns were still inundated with
letters of support.

Mr Mitchell refused to comment on reports they had received death
threats to their home but said they had contacted police over two
letters.

He said: 'The vast majority is supportive, or at least polite, but
very occasionally there is something nasty. On two occasions we have
had to refer it to the police, but I don't want to go into any detail
about that.'

A book about the couple's ordeal could raise £1million for the Find
Madeleine fund, according to the former head of buying for
Waterstone's, Scott Pack.

He said: 'It could go for a million. There is a feeling that we know
everything there is to know about this story but the public are still
fascinated.

'It has the potential to be of enormous interest with buyers across
the market, from the literary middle class audience who think "This
could have been us" to the mass market who buy books in supermarkets
and have been devouring this story for a year.'

But publisher Patrick Jenson-Smith said it could be difficult to sell
'a story without a conclusion'.

Books by Sara Payne, the mother of murdered schoolgirl Sarah Payne,
and Kevin Wells, the father of Soham murder victim Holly Wells, both
dominated the bestsellers lists in Britain for months.

A series of books about the year-long hunt for Madeleine, written by
journalists, criminologist and policemen, have already proved popular
in Portugal.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1017010/McCanns-set-make-1m-writing-tell-book-year-hell-Madeleine-vanished.html

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.true-crime/2008-04/msg02855.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-562371/McCann-twins-pick-phone-day-ask-Where-Madeleine.html

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/maddie/1106514/Maddie-McCann-Kate-and-Gerry-documentary.html?pageNo=4

McCanns to write a book

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id232.html

Keep the dosh rolling in.

Madeleine's small body to be sold once again by her parents. Well at least it tells me one thing, donations from the gullible public have not rolled in , their open letter to their celeb pals, have not coughed up and Brian Kennedy to pay for all costs until Madeleine has been found seems to have hit a glitch. The McCanns are going to write 'their truth' which will be page upon page of lies. I am curious as to why Sky have pulled their tweet though, promoting the parents book, who by the skin of their teeth have not been charged, maybe they had a momets thought for Madeleine. I doubt it but it would be nice to think someone, somewhere, had a thought for her apart from us bloggers. Another very sad day.

http://yeremi-vargas.blogspot.com/2010/11/los-padres-de-madeleine-escribieron-un.html