Thursday, July 5, 2012

McCann: Stephen Birch And The Framing Of Robert Murat.

Someone has suggested something rather interesting. Let's say for arguments sake Madeleine was buried in the grounds of Jennifer Murat's home...what better way than to frame Murat so the police would find Maddies remains....only they didn't, did they !

Lets look again at the article by Paulo Reis  ' The Framing Of Robert Murat'....and lets read it as though we were Tanner with the knowledge we knew Madeleine was buried in Murats garden.


http://thetapas9janetanner.blogspot.com.es/2012/02/jane-tanner-and-framing-of-robert-murat.html

http://steelmagnolia-steelmagnolia.blogspot.com.es/2012/07/mccann-stephen-birch-south-african.html

#McCann: Stephen Birch South African Researcher.'Madeleine Died May 3rd 2007'


You will have to scroll down for the video , but the theory is very interesting . For those who remember poster Rosiepops on the Daily Express, she once spent an entire evening trying to convince fellow posters that blood was found belonging to Madeleine in Murats garden. Stephen Birch has a legal team on hand so will be ready for the McCanns.

Claudia, posting on the link provided is a very good friend of Goncalo Amaral and has just given her reaction to this latest 'news' ...I think we can put this one to bed. Another attention seeker wanting his 15 minutes of fame. Sadly we gave it to him.

http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t20873p30-south-african-researcher-tells-the-cm-what-he-found-when-he-sought-to-know-what-happened-to-maddie-explosive-revelations-to-read-in-the-cm

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

McCann Trolls: U.K To Become Safe Haven For Cyber Bullies.

With an astonishing amount of ‘spin’ or simply misguided thinking, the UK coalition government is proposing a new law which will result in the UK becoming a safe haven for internet trolls, cyber bullies and harassment. Here’s a typical news report which follows the Government spun line that this new law will improve the lives of victims of trolls and cyberbullying.

The Defamation Bill will actually makes it even harder, and probably impossible, for the ordinary individual in the UK to deal with stalking, harassment, cyberbullying and online trolling.
The news headlines are reporting the government spun line that anonymity will be removed and identities of cyber bullies exposed....read more

http://regainyourname.com/news/uk-safehaven-trolls-cyberbullying-defamation-bill/

McCann:The Mirror journalist Greig Box-Turnbull who reported (wrongly) JK Rowling helped Kate McCann write her book 'madeleine' latest corrupt arrestee!


H/T via twitter-

Humpty Bumpty @RealHumptyB

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

The Sinister McCanns: I Can Only Echo How Sick The Public Are Of The McCanns - Their Lies And Their Fraudulent Fund - Making Money From The Blood Of Your Own Daughter Defies Belief.





I am ashamed of this country at times. This condition once again flared up on my arrival at John Lennon Airport, as plastered quite liberally throughout the airport were posters of Madeleine McCann, both her 3 year old self and her ‘photo fit’ supposed 7 year old self.
 It feels like a ridiculously brazen act on their part, not to belittle the loss of a child, which I imagine is the worst thing that can happen to a parent, far beyond my comprehension.
 Yet my sympathy is somewhat diminished in light of the self inflicted nature of the incidence; leaving your child unattended in an unlocked room is equally incomprehensible to myself.

While the media attention has undoubtedly diminished, it’s clear that the McCann PR machine continues to run strong if only in light of Maddie’s appearance at the airport.
Not only did the soulless computer-generated eyes of her hypothetical self linger across the majority of the advertising space made available at the airport, but her mother’s book recounting the incidence takes centre stage at the various WHSmiths on offer.
The whole affair feels like a massive post-modern joke; an unreleased sketch from Monkey Dust, where as a society we have managed accept that there be only one lost child worth our attention (or lack of, depending on your perspective), a Schrödinger’s cat of a celebrity.
 In the wake of the initial hype, I expected a lesser media copy to appear, a Deep Impact to McCann’s Armageddon, to which I could overhear in the streets “Aaw it’s like that Maddie thing all over again!” as if the benchmark was set in child abductions. While condescending it would still have heightened awareness, this didn’t happen, nothing happened, the continuing stream of abductions and missing children remained unreported and uncared about to society.

That’s really where my disdain lies, that this family have profited from the tragedy to such a large extent, continuing to do so 5 years on.
 I understand that parents will do all in their power to protect (in this case return) their children. Sadly Madeline was not the only child to be abducted that year or any subsequent year since.
Where have their 5 year campaigns been?
 Where have their 5 years of support from respective governments been?
Their book deals?
Or is this level of support limited solely for the well-to-do and media-savvy families?
Yes it would seem so, as they’re the first to do so and as a nation we can’t deal with too much tragedy, so we’ll allow one through and then fixate. This trend was once again highlighted with Jimmy Carr’s tax scandal. While certainly not the only one to do it and definitely not the largest offender, it’s easier to pinpoint him “coz e’s from the TV” ahead of say, major Tory contributor George Robinson, embroiled in the same scheme. We’re still waiting for Cameron’s moral condemnation of Mr Robinson.

So no, despite your last minute reminders, I shan’t be looking for Maddie in Estonia. Not till the Maddie stops being a commodity sold at the expense of others looking.

About the Author
Spencer Montagu - Spencer is a 2nd year Philosophy student from Paris, who has called Liverpool home for most of his life.

Monday, July 2, 2012

McCann:U.S. Journalist Banned From U.K For Investigating Jersey Child Abuse.

Interesting to note that in her book 'madeleine' Kate exonerates herself by suggesting the public look to the Jersey Child Abuse case as an example.

Quote

 
The dogs: We realise that the behaviour of the dogs was the turning point in the investigation for the PJ. The use of dogs has proved to be problematic and unreliable in previous cases(please refer to the Jersey ‘Haut de La Garenne’ case and other research published about their use and reliability).

It is vital to note that alerts by such dogs are classified as intelligence rather than evidence, as police officers familiar with their use will verify. These alerts must be supported by forensics in order to be used as evidence. The results of the forensic examinations did not identify any blood or Madeleine’s DNA. To suggest or use the dogs´ reactions as evidence is simply wrong and abusive.




 ARTICLE:

Last week the Guardian ran a series of articles on the Channel Islands, covering both the lack of a proper response to allegations if child abuse on Jersey and the Barclay brothers' apparent attempt to dominate life on Sark. They featured our own Tom McNally in the role of a governor general paying a rare visit to a remote and troublesome archipelago.

Perhaps the most serious topic raise was the allegation that an American journalist has been banned from the UK and the Channel Islands because she was writing a book about child abuse on Jersey.
Leah McGrath Goodman tells the story on her own blog:
A couple years into my research, my trips to the UK were becoming frequent enough to justify my renting a flat for overnight stays and an office for my paperwork. Jersey has strict rules about outsiders renting property, so I arranged to meet with Jersey’s Customs and Immigration officials in July 2011 to make sure my accommodations passed muster. I was told they did. The first officer I met with, Jim Griffiths, told me not to worry and that as long as I did not intend to live in Jersey or take a job there – and my trips did not exceed the six-month time limit for visitors – I could proceed with my work. 
When he asked what I was researching, I was completely honest. He quickly excused himself and then returned with his superior. The two men proceeded to shout at me. I was told that I needed to get a long-term entry visa to conduct my work on the island. I asked if they had changed their minds due to the nature of my research. The two men would not answer the question and immediately escorted me out. ...read more

http://liberalengland.blogspot.com.es/2012/07/us-journalist-banned-from-britain-for.html