Saturday, July 21, 2012
Friday, July 20, 2012
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
McCann: Claudia Lawrence 'Sighting' Family Say It Seems Too Good To Be True ...If Only They Knew !
Kate became head of Missing People and we had a 'Claudia' sighting. Just keep thinking Mr. Lawrence and you will work it out.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-18831408
'Is Claudia A prisoner in Amsterdam ?'
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4429952/Is-Claudia-a-prisoner-in-Amsterdam.html
'Is Madeleine In Amsterdam?'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2506098/Madeleine-McCann-Gerry-and-Kate-learn-of-Amsterdam-sighting.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-18831408
'Is Claudia A prisoner in Amsterdam ?'
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4429952/Is-Claudia-a-prisoner-in-Amsterdam.html
'Is Madeleine In Amsterdam?'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2506098/Madeleine-McCann-Gerry-and-Kate-learn-of-Amsterdam-sighting.html
The couple were in Amsterdam to launch the Dutch edition of the book which they hope will help to boost the search for Madeleine across Europe.
Speaking at a press conference held at York Race Course, her sister, Ali Sims, said it was "too good to be true".
On Tuesday an ex-detective claimed to have seen Ms Lawrence in Amsterdam a week ago. North Yorkshire Police said the sighting was yet to be verified.
Ms Lawrence, who worked at the University of York, was last seen on 18 March 2009.
Her father, Peter Lawrence, said: "I cannot imagine Claudia just wandering around anywhere freely on her own."
Ms Sims said: "Why would she be in Amsterdam and not have got in touch with us, unless she's suffered from amnesia?
"It almost seems too good to be true that somene's seen her.
"We want more then anything for her to be at home".
A police spokesman said: "North Yorkshire Police are liaising with police officers in Holland in relation to the recent contact from a member of the public who reported seeing a woman in Amsterdam resembling missing York woman Claudia Lawrence."
The inquiry into Ms Lawrence's disappearance was the largest in the recent history of North Yorkshire Police, but the force scaled down the investigation after 16 months in July 2010.
The family of missing York chef Claudia Lawrence are sceptical about a reported sighting of her in Amsterdam.
On Tuesday an ex-detective claimed to have seen Ms Lawrence in Amsterdam a week ago. North Yorkshire Police said the sighting was yet to be verified.
Ms Lawrence, who worked at the University of York, was last seen on 18 March 2009.
Her father, Peter Lawrence, said: "I cannot imagine Claudia just wandering around anywhere freely on her own."
Ms Sims said: "Why would she be in Amsterdam and not have got in touch with us, unless she's suffered from amnesia?
"It almost seems too good to be true that somene's seen her.
"We want more then anything for her to be at home".
A police spokesman said: "North Yorkshire Police are liaising with police officers in Holland in relation to the recent contact from a member of the public who reported seeing a woman in Amsterdam resembling missing York woman Claudia Lawrence."
The inquiry into Ms Lawrence's disappearance was the largest in the recent history of North Yorkshire Police, but the force scaled down the investigation after 16 months in July 2010.
McCann: Court Acquits The Accused Of Defaming Gonçalo Amaral.
Article in full at Jill Havern Forum.
So, it would appear when it comes to defamation one can say what the hell one like's ! The McCanns won't like that.
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t5306-court-acquits-accused-of-defaming-goncalo-amaral
So, it would appear when it comes to defamation one can say what the hell one like's ! The McCanns won't like that.
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t5306-court-acquits-accused-of-defaming-goncalo-amaral
The Manic Eyes Of Gerry McCann And The Evil That Dwells Within.
Watch his eyes in both of these video clips. What do you see, evil, insanity or a little of BOTH?
Monday, July 16, 2012
Gerry McCann 'Did You Kill Maddie' ? It Has Been Suggested That You Also Watch This Footage With The Volume Switched Off - Why Would They Hide Her Body ? Sedatives Of Course - Pat Brown Explains.
The sedation of Madeleine on TWO separate evenings by the 'abductor'. Criminal Profiler Pat Brown weighs in on Kate McCann's bizarre thought pattern.
http://mccannsvthethreemusketeers.blogspot.com.es/2012/04/mccann-pat-brown-picks-up-on-kate.html
Source for transcript. Jill Havern Forum.
Dr. Roberts 'Now we know' 2011 with thanks to McCannfiles:
"Did you kill your daughter?" asks the lady journalist. Gerry answers:
"No. That's an emphatic 'no.' I mean the ludicrous thing is. Errm... what... I suppose... what's been purported from Portugal is that Madeleine died in the apartment by an accident and we hid her body. Well, when did she have the accident and died? Cos... the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner, so if she died then, how could we have disposed of... hidden her body when there was an immediate search. It's just nonsense. So. An' if she died when we were in the apartment or fell injured, why would we... why would we cover that up?"
KM (interjecting): "And it gets even more ludicrous, that we've obviously hidden her so incredibly well, where nobody's found her and we hid her (interviewer: 'incredibly well') so well that we then decided that we'd move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know it's just ridiculous."
Let's take this a step at a time.
"Did you kill your daughter?"
"No. That's an emphatic 'no.'"
This is Gerry speaking don't forget. For any other innocent mortal 'Absolutely not' would have been a sufficient response. Not for Gerry though. Despite his subsequent claim, he gives a decidedly unemphatic answer - 'No.' What follows is meta-language, where he is describing his earlier articulation of a word and does not address the underlying semantics in any way. Incoherent and unnecessary expansion then takes us away from the original question, referencing what has been 'purported' in Portugal, namely that 'Madeleine died in the apartment by an accident and we hid her body.'
Next comes a cunning locking of the incident to a specific time frame, with the suggestion that Madeleine could only have had an accident when unattended. But Gerry slips up in questioning how it would have been possible for them to have disposed of Madeleine's body. In immediately substituting the phrase hidden her body he has already told us what in fact happened. Excitedly he goes on to ask why the parents should have covered up an accident. Why indeed.
It hardly comes as a surprise that Kate leaps in at this point, before Gerry's mouth can write any more bad cheques. She loses no time in elaborating upon the 'hide-and-seek' scenario played out that Thursday night, and the 'ludicrous' idea of their hire car being involved afterwards. But the damage has already been done.
The script, charitably outlined by Goncalo Amaral and fleshed out here by the McCanns, so as to exonerate themselves, depends entirely for its effect upon the premise that little Madeleine disappeared inexplicably that Thursday night; a premise that becomes less clear the closer it is examined. And Gerry is right. It wouldn't make sense to conceal an accident.
"Did you kill your daughter?" asks the lady journalist. Gerry answers:
"No. That's an emphatic 'no.' I mean the ludicrous thing is. Errm... what... I suppose... what's been purported from Portugal is that Madeleine died in the apartment by an accident and we hid her body. Well, when did she have the accident and died? Cos... the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner, so if she died then, how could we have disposed of... hidden her body when there was an immediate search. It's just nonsense. So. An' if she died when we were in the apartment or fell injured, why would we... why would we cover that up?"
KM (interjecting): "And it gets even more ludicrous, that we've obviously hidden her so incredibly well, where nobody's found her and we hid her (interviewer: 'incredibly well') so well that we then decided that we'd move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know it's just ridiculous."
Let's take this a step at a time.
"Did you kill your daughter?"
"No. That's an emphatic 'no.'"
This is Gerry speaking don't forget. For any other innocent mortal 'Absolutely not' would have been a sufficient response. Not for Gerry though. Despite his subsequent claim, he gives a decidedly unemphatic answer - 'No.' What follows is meta-language, where he is describing his earlier articulation of a word and does not address the underlying semantics in any way. Incoherent and unnecessary expansion then takes us away from the original question, referencing what has been 'purported' in Portugal, namely that 'Madeleine died in the apartment by an accident and we hid her body.'
Next comes a cunning locking of the incident to a specific time frame, with the suggestion that Madeleine could only have had an accident when unattended. But Gerry slips up in questioning how it would have been possible for them to have disposed of Madeleine's body. In immediately substituting the phrase hidden her body he has already told us what in fact happened. Excitedly he goes on to ask why the parents should have covered up an accident. Why indeed.
It hardly comes as a surprise that Kate leaps in at this point, before Gerry's mouth can write any more bad cheques. She loses no time in elaborating upon the 'hide-and-seek' scenario played out that Thursday night, and the 'ludicrous' idea of their hire car being involved afterwards. But the damage has already been done.
The script, charitably outlined by Goncalo Amaral and fleshed out here by the McCanns, so as to exonerate themselves, depends entirely for its effect upon the premise that little Madeleine disappeared inexplicably that Thursday night; a premise that becomes less clear the closer it is examined. And Gerry is right. It wouldn't make sense to conceal an accident.
Sunday, July 15, 2012
McCann: Missing People - Why Claudia Lawrence?
Kate McCann has weazled her way into the lives of the Lawrence family for quite some time now, her motives sinister and to put it bluntly, evil. Self serving Kate.
The police were able to do a thorough investigation on missing Claudia , unlike the McCann's who had political protection. The most we heard about Healy, she was known as 'hotlips' and enjoyed a good drink.
Claudia's parents were horrified when the police investigation revealed their daughters secret life ( I am not going to go into details, it is all there on the internet) and concluded that their daughters lifestyle had led to her murder. Lacking evidence they readily admit they have no proof she is dead but they do believe they have spoken with her killer and even tried to put pressure on him. Could that imply they know who he is ? if so they are keeping their cards very close to their chest and waiting for a break in the case, a confession or for someone to come forward .
However, no sooner was 'child neglector alibi Kate' in her rightful place in life heading Missing People when there appeared the very same day an amazing breakthough after three long years of silence, we had a 'Claudia' sighting in Amsterdam (google McCann Amsterdam for connections).
Murdoch's Sun ran a story today asking ' Is Claudia kept a prisoner in Amsterdam' ?...very much like another story we are familiar with ' Is Maddie in a secret lair' ?
Now here's the rub, cadaver dogs in the early stages of Claudia's disappearance were part of the investigation, with negative results. There were no 'hits' from the dogs to indicate Claudia had died in her apartment. Had the dogs indicated to the death of Claudia, the Lawrence family would not have seen Kate McCann for dust.
Murdoch's SUN now have Claudia in their sight and the McCann spin has begun. Missing People will soon be too toxic to touch when parents start to understand that 'sightings' of their loved ones not seen or heard from for years start popping up in foreign lands to sell Rupert Murdoch's gutter rag. Time is on our side.
The police were able to do a thorough investigation on missing Claudia , unlike the McCann's who had political protection. The most we heard about Healy, she was known as 'hotlips' and enjoyed a good drink.
Claudia's parents were horrified when the police investigation revealed their daughters secret life ( I am not going to go into details, it is all there on the internet) and concluded that their daughters lifestyle had led to her murder. Lacking evidence they readily admit they have no proof she is dead but they do believe they have spoken with her killer and even tried to put pressure on him. Could that imply they know who he is ? if so they are keeping their cards very close to their chest and waiting for a break in the case, a confession or for someone to come forward .
However, no sooner was 'child neglector alibi Kate' in her rightful place in life heading Missing People when there appeared the very same day an amazing breakthough after three long years of silence, we had a 'Claudia' sighting in Amsterdam (google McCann Amsterdam for connections).
Murdoch's Sun ran a story today asking ' Is Claudia kept a prisoner in Amsterdam' ?...very much like another story we are familiar with ' Is Maddie in a secret lair' ?
Now here's the rub, cadaver dogs in the early stages of Claudia's disappearance were part of the investigation, with negative results. There were no 'hits' from the dogs to indicate Claudia had died in her apartment. Had the dogs indicated to the death of Claudia, the Lawrence family would not have seen Kate McCann for dust.
Murdoch's SUN now have Claudia in their sight and the McCann spin has begun. Missing People will soon be too toxic to touch when parents start to understand that 'sightings' of their loved ones not seen or heard from for years start popping up in foreign lands to sell Rupert Murdoch's gutter rag. Time is on our side.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)