The McCanns U.K .ILLUSION But For Those Who Know The Darker Side They Have Aleady Been Condemned And Judged

http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t21220-mcminute-video-mccanns-need-to-maintain-an-illusion-in-britain

Paulo Sargento Speaks Out On The Bad Parenting By McCanns And His Deep Concern For Their Two Remaining Children.

McCann Back In Washington August 24th - Then Watch Again HiDeHo's Latest Video - Plan's On Leaving Kate FAR Behind ?

August 24th 2007

McCann in the U.S.

Before he left, he had a tearful goodbye to his wife Kate, who is still in Portugal with twins Sean and Amelie.

Gerry is in the U.S. to learn more about how the country works to prevent children from becoming victims of trafficking and sexual abuse.

Heart Specialist McCann, according to Sky News, among other things, met America's first lady, Laura Bush. He will also meet with several senators and congressmen, reports Sky News.

He has already met with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Gerry McCann and his wife Kate have together fronted a massive campaign after four-year-old Madeleine disappeared from the holiday apartment in Praia da Luz in Portugal 3 May this year.

- My focus now is obviously to get my daughter back. It is most important, said McCann told reporters.

- But I think there is much goodwill out there now, so maybe we can do something tangible to help all children, said Father McCann.

Posters with pictures of the missing four-year-old hanging in bookstores in 200 countries worldwide, at the request of Harry Potter author JK Rowling.

This weekend it was announced that a Portuguese campaign wants to get Madeleine McCann parents accused of neglect. Yesterday parents beat back the criticism and called it painful.

- Kate and I find this criticism very painful and unhelpful. Our pain and anxiety is increasing every hour, said Gerry McCann.

 http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2007/07/24/506991.html

McCann:EXPLOSIVE Moment For Gerry - In Court The Moment He Discovered WHO Brought The Cadaver Dogs In.

I have waited a long time for HiDeho to put this video together, now it is finally here.


I ask you  to look at the following link from Ricardo Paiva, his own personal thoughts on the McCanns'. Kate Healy, so full of herself seriously believed Ricardo found her attractive , but how can a police officer find a woman attractive who he believed was involved in the disappearance of her own daughter ? Getting close to the prime suspect was Paiva's assignment as' too late Healy' realized ' fucking tossa' he was later to be named in her book  'madeleine'

http://ricardopaivakatesfingtosser.blogspot.com.es/2012/05/mccann-ricardo-paivo-mccanns-curious.html

A second officer, Ricardo Paiva, said Portuguese police were suspicious of the couple's 'merchandising' operation in the months after Maddie disappeared. The Madeleine Fund they set up sold wristbands and T-shirts publicising the case and used the money to support the search.

Mr Paiva said they should have faced prosecution for leaving their children alone, saying: 'People have been arrested for far less - even in the UK.'
Former Portuguese detective Goncalo Amaral wrote a book accusing the McCanns of covering up their daughter's death





http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t21195-video-kate-s-dream-the-catalyst-to-bring-in-the-cadaver-dogs-the-mccann-s-suspicious-behaviour-at-that-time

McCann : Stephen Birch Updates - Maddies Body In Murat's Garden.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id413.html


http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t5253p500-investigator-ensures-that-maddie-s-body-in-the-backyard-of-murat

Ground radar scan, taken by Stephen Birch, showing area below the Murat driveway

Gerry McCann:'Something In His Eyes Dead And Cold Like A Shark'.

Here we have someone who knew Gerry McCann, unusual as the powers that be have all but removed his past which therefore must be an interesting one. A non believer sensed the evil that dwelt within McCann even as a child.

 

Glasgow University product Gerry McCann is pressing for a review of Madeleine Case, why isn’t he asking for it to be reopened by Portuguese Police?

Dear All

Glasgow University product Gerry McCann and his wife Kate McCann have written a letter to the Prime Minister David Cameron.

So far, the Tory Government has steered clear in the most part of the McCann Circus which the Labour Government inappropriately involved themselves beyond what reasonably be expected by Consulate Staff and Government.

If a review does take place this should be handled by the Portuguese Police.

Anyway I thought I would go through their letter and make a few points.

“Dear Prime Minister

As a devoted father and family man, you know the importance of children. Our beloved eldest child, Madeleine, was abducted from Praia da Luz, Portugal, four years ago. Since then, we have devoted all our energies to ensuring her safe return”.

This statement begs the question, why on the night of her disappearance did they not join the search for her?

Remember they say:

“we have devoted all our energies to ensuring her safe return”.

Mighty big of them since they are partly to blame for her unsafe exit!

“Today we are asking you – and the British and Portuguese governments – to help find Madeleine and bring her back to her loving family.

We live in hope that Madeleine will be found alive and returned to us. One call might be all that is needed to lead to Madeleine and her abductor”.

This is a continuation of their version which has raised doubts that she was kidnapped, and the theory that first emerged that the parents were to be considered suspects didn’t come from the Portuguese Police but from the British.

“To this end, we are seeking a joint INDEPENDENT, TRANSPARENT and COMPREHENSIVE review of ALL information held in relation to Madeleine’s disappearance. Thus far, there has been NO formal review of the material held by the police authorities – which is routine practice in most major unsolved crimes”.

What is the point of a review when they are not asking for a re-opening of the case?

“A key piece of the ‘jigsaw’ could easily have been overlooked and not joined up with another.

We have tried in vain to get the authorities in the UK and Portugal to play their part”.

Here the McCann’s put forward the theory that Police in both Britain and Portugal should be following their lead, it doesn’t work that way.

“But, sadly, our requests have seemingly fallen on deaf ears. It is simply not acceptable that they have, to all intents and purposes, given up on Madeleine”.

Talking of deaf ears, did Kate McCann’s hearing fail her during her 11 hour interview in which she refused to answer 48 questions posed by the Portuguese Police?

Did the McCann’s co-operate with the Portuguese Police to the fullest extent which a reasonable person could expect?

No!

“I know you will share our concern that no law enforcement agency in the world is currently searching for Madeleine. Our small team of investigators is working alone. They do not have access to all the information gathered during the course of the investigation and have no statutory powers”.

This statement begs the question again why didn’t they ask for the case to be re-opened in Portugal?

“It is fundamental for any major incident that a case review is undertaken to identify all the avenues that could be explored that might lead to new information coming into the inquiry. The information in Madeleine’s case is not even held on one central, searchable database capable of linking data”.

Here we have an unjust criticism of the Portuguese Police Service.

“The benefits of pulling together different bits of evidence can be enormous but until this is done we cannot be sure what, if anything, has been missed. Four years may have passed but Madeleine is still findable. As we have said before we don’t want hollow, meaningless words”.

Have the McCann ‘investigators’ turned over their material to the Portuguese Police, have they turned up any real evidence of abduction?

“We want action. We want the authorities to help us. Madeleine’s abductor is still out there – other children may be at risk”.

Four years have passed and during that time the McCann’s could and should have made themselves available to the Portuguese Police and asked for the case to be re-opened.

They didn’t.

“It is not good enough to just say it’s a Portuguese investigation”.

In order for this to be a cross border investigation then evidence would have to be presented that Madeleine crossed a border. So far, there is no evidence this has happened and no evidence that she entered Britain which would trigger a proper British investigation.

This is outside British Police Jurisdiction, it remains a Portuguese Police matter.

“It is not right that a young vulnerable British citizen has essentially been given up on. This remains an unsolved case of a missing child. Children are our most precious gift”.

Perhaps the McCann’s should take a long hard look in the mirror, they decided not to talk, not to help and by their actions were obstructive in the Police investigation.

“Children are our most precious gift”.

Which begs another question why did the McCann’s for five nights in a row abandoned 3 children under five years old in an apartment?

“Please don’t give up on Madeleine.

Kate and Gerry McCann”

I think people would be more inclined to help if the McCann’s started to answer the 48 questions posed by the Police.

The McCann’s want a Police investigation which they can direct and control, someone should explain to them that will not happen by either the British or Portuguese Police.

I remember Gerry McCann from my time at Glasgow University, he was in the Hares and Hounds running club at The Stevenson Building; you would walk by him and immediately turn round and check him, something in his eyes, dead and cold like a shark.
I always got a bad feeling off him when I saw him.

As to Prime Minister David Cameron, I don’t think he and his government will make the same mistake Gordon Brown and the Labour Government made.

The facts remain the facts, and I would like to know why the McCann’s version of events didn’t stack up to some of the evidence in the case.

For example, why was Madeleine’s favourite toy Cuddlecat that Kate McCann said she took everywhere contaminated with a death scent?

http://glasgowunihumanrights.blogspot.com/2010/12/madeleine-mccann-case-why-wasnt.html

Why didn’t Cuddlecat contaminate Madeleines’ bed when Madeleine was asleep and sweating?

Remember Kate McCann said that she had ‘the toy tightly in her arms as she did every night’.

I think people might be tempted to opine that Cuddlecat was contaminated post mortem.

Cuddlecat is in a static location with Madeleine sweating for several hours through-out the night and no contamination of the bed sheets and pillow.

Nothing!

Is it just me who finds that odd?

Yours sincerely

George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University

http://glasgowunihumanrights.blogspot.com.es/2011/05/glasgow-university-product-gerry-mccann.html

McCann : Hanover And Brooks Turned A Solid Police Investigation Into 'Libel' Through A Corrupt Media - And That's A Fact.

Hiding your criminal activity amongst those who are truly innocent is the oldest trick in the book. Maddie knows the truth, that is ALL that matters. The two suspects on their return to England used the money from a fraudulent fund to 'clean' their reputation. The McCanns are and always will be the ONLY suspects in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine.


http://www.hanovercomms.com/our-clients/case-studies/mccann-family/

Dowlers and McCanns 'oppose newspapers' plan for new regulator'


Lawyer for victims of press intrusion tells Leveson inquiry that Lord Hunt and Lord Black's proposals are 'hopeless'

• 
  Lisa O'Carroll
• guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 24 July 2012 17.32 BST

The Leveson inquiry was told that Bob and Sally Dowler and others oppose the press industry's plan for a new regulator. Photograph: Pool/Reuters

The 50 victims of alleged phone hacking and other media intrusion represented at the Leveson inquiry are opposing the newspaper industry's proposals for reform of press regulation.

David Sherborne, counsel for the victims, which include the Dowler and McCann families, described the proposals put forward by Lord Hunt, chairman of the Press Complaints Commission, as "hopeless".

The new regulator being backed by newspapers to replace the PCC would involve a continuation of self-regulation but with new powers to investigate systemic wrongdoing and the power to fine errant papers up to £1m.

"The simple fact is that Lord Hunt's proposal is not, as the inquiry has heard, what the victims would require. Its starting point, its whole premise is what is acceptable to the industry. But forgive me, we're not here solely to decide what is acceptable to the industry," Sherborne told the inquiry on Tuesday in his closing statement.

"We're here because the industry is not acceptable to the public, with whom there seems to have been no consultation by Lord Hunt's team."

He said the proposals that have come out of the "still surviving, but only just breathing PCC" would not wash with the public, who want an independent statute-backed regulator "which is created for the public and is not run by service editors".

"However well intentioned it may be, as a proposal to deal with the practice, culture and ethics we've witnessed, it is hopeless," Sherborne added.

Sherborne said that the public wanted a clean break with the past and deserved a new press regulator that was independent and had teeth.

He said that arguments put forward by newspapers that statutory regulation would lead to interference by politicians or have a "chilling effect" on investigative journalism were "specious".

"We say there should be an entirely new regime, a clean break not just in name but in substance from everything that has come before and failed," said Sherborne.

He added that the new press regulator should not involve working editors adjudicating on complaints.

"There should be separate mechanisms for rule-making, for investigations, including investigations of the regulator's own motion, and most importantly for adjudications. A body of independent adjudicators should rule upon complaints as to media conduct and serving editors should have no role in that," Sherborne said.

"The public wants more objective standards and the starting point for that is an independent statute-backed regulator, which is created for the public and is not run by serving editors and one which can hold this enormously influential body to account, as they hold us to account in turn."

He said that unless someone gets a "very firm grip" of the tabloid press, newspapers will continue to behave badly. Sherborne told Lord Justice Leveson he feared that tabloids would be back to their old ways as soon as the "ink dried on your report", which is expected to be published in the autumn.

"To some extent over the last eight months, what has been lost is the voice of the victims," he said, referring to the fact that the victims of press intrusion he represents gave evidence early on during the Leveson witness hearings, in late 2011.

Sherborne went on to list some of what he described as "a catalogue of wrongs, systemic, flagrant and deeply entrenched". "We are not here to focus on the good journalists. We don't need an inquiry for them. We are here to consider the bad ones," he said.

"The press is on trial here, and not simply in this room but also out there in the court of public opinion. And they know it. That is why they are so scared of what evidence has been heard here.

"Unless someone takes a grip, a very firm grip, of the tabloid press, we will be back to the same position as soon as the spotlight is turned off and the ink is dry on your report.

"And we are all concerned it may be payback time – payback for those who have sought to stand up. Hopefully the press will resist the temptation once this is over."http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jul/24/dowler-mccann-newspaper-regulator