Monday, December 20, 2010

Max Clifford the Dick Head !!!!!

I am placing this here because,  how I wish someone had had the balls to say these words to Clarence Mitchell in the defence of Madeleine...

Sunday, December 19, 2010

DEWANIS/MCCANNS 'No stone unturned'.

Max Clifford has already related the Dewanis to the McCanns, perfect timing for them to board the gravy train as they whinge and whine how they were also treated this way in Portugal. This would not only help the Dewanis , but Shrenis point blank refusal to return to South Africa,  as the tapas 7, also refused to return to do the reconstruction for fear of being set-up.. The McCanns must be missing the limelight and of course even more the  money....The McCanns never one to think of the 'victim' will have no qualms as to Anni's fate and using her for their own we have seen many times before, Marie luz Cortez....and their own daughter Madeleine.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Wikileaks and why we need them...

McCanns very quick to write on their blog about Wikileaks cables....lets hope it is only a question of time before the Gaspar statement is leaked through the right channels. Question is, will the British media  have the balls to publish? If they do, it is all over for the McCanns.

WIKILEAKS need to somehow, someway have this published in the press...if not in England, find another country, so the truth may be known.

On a seperate note the Telegraph are doing their very best to prove the innocence of Shreni Dewani, innocence is proven in a court of law. If Mr.Dewani is innocent of these alleged charges, then he should want to return to South Africa and prove it, if not for himself, for the parents of Anni ,who will never know a moments peace until the truth is told.

Shrena and Annis last dance....

Kates 'cool million' 'her year of hell'

Thursday, December 16, 2010

McCanns: Scathing book rights will go to the highest your bets

MADELEINE McCann: Kate and Gerry McCann’s book about their daughter has yet to be written but already the reviews are coming in. Philomena McCann, Gerry McCann’s sister, says the work is “truthful and scathing”.

The McCann’s fund is not as full as it once was.

The book will raise monies.

But does it need to be sensationalised?

Isn’t that what the press did what the child went missing, cranking up the single-thread story into a feeding frenzy of libel and accusation?

Here’s Philomena McCann:
“Kate is mainly doing it and I know she has written some very truthful and scathing things relating to the Portuguese police.”
Why focus on them? Did they take Our Maddie? Is this book about revenge for them labelling her an arguido?
When Madeleine went missing we thought it would be really important for Kate to keep a detailed journal and she felt it was important to keep an account of everything and some of it has been used for the book.
“I don’t know if I will be able to read it myself. I have been thinking about it but I think I may find it too upsetting.”
What can be in it that Ms McCann has not already heard or felt? She then adds a rather confusing line:
“Kate and Gerry feel a real responsibility that they don’t want to continue asking the public to support them, and that support has allowed them to go on.”
Anyone understand that?
“They think about what they can do to help themselves and they came up with this idea.”
But how will the book be marketed?

 Is it a whodunit?

 The McCanns are writing the book to raise cash. And, as they say:
“We are hopeful that this book may help the investigation to find Madeleine in other ways too. Our hope is that it may prompt those who have relevant information, knowingly or not, to come forward and share it with our team.”
One day after the book hits the shelves, Prince William and Kate Middleton will marry. The book will not be the thing – rather whichever newspaper serialises it will.

Monday, December 13, 2010


Guardian pick up on the dogs..the Daily Mail true to form do not..sad neither mentioned the Gaspar statement this would have been a perfect opportunity to put a toe in the water.

Friday, December 10, 2010



chaplins bar

We cannot know, at present, whether Chaplins is true or not, but Amaral has promised explosive revelations in his forthcoming book.
parte de um comentário :
"......... The McCann’s went to another restaurant (Chaplin’s) the previous night which was even further away from where they were staying and they left their children alone even at that distance. Chaplin’s is 800 metres more in distance than the 200 metres it takes to get to the Tapas Bar.

MW’s staff had to go and find them and ask the McCann’s to return to their apartment as one of their children had been crying for over an hour and a half. The next day MW’s offered them a babysitter for the night (for free) on the 3rd May and the McCann’s cancelled her services and went to the Tapas Bar which was 200 metres away not 50 yards as the McCann’s have stated). Even after all that crying from their child the previous night, they still left their children alone again the next night. If that is not wilful neglect, what the hell is? "..........
Quiz Night
Would a quiz night attract you? And if so, what night might quiz night be? Why, quiz night isTuesday night!
Chaplins inform us:
“FUN” QUIZ NIGHT every Tuesday, start 10 pm
But, is there any evidence that the tapas 9 enjoyed quizzes? Well, it seems they were not averse to them, for, in relation to the night of 3 May, Sol informs us
An aerobic instructor from the resort entertains the dinner guests at Tapas with a ‘Quiz’. At 9.30 p.m. the game ends, and Gerry invites her to their table, where she stays for half an hour.
Happy Hour
Is there anything that might encourage late evening drinking at Chaplins? Well how about a ‘Happy Hour’
Last year, this was advertised as follows:
Later on in the evening, once the food has finished, Chaplins swings into Bar mode and is soon full of people enjoying the music, the great company and perhaps most of all the Happy Hour (11.30pm - 12.30pm) when all drinks are half price.
Some Thoughts
What is interesting about the Chaplins story, if true, is what hangs from it. From the point of public relations, were it to become media mainstream, it could be extraordinarily damaging to the McCann cause.
The suspicious minded may also ask whether anything more serious than crying occurred.
We cannot know, at present, whether Chaplins is true or not, but Amaral has promised explosive revelations in his forthcoming book. "

Anonymous said...
Paulo, Thanks again for the updates. Over the past two weeks there has been rampant speculation that Maddie died on the night of the 2nd or in the early hours of the 3rd, after her parents had to be dragged out of a bar that was located a mile from the apartment. Can you confirm that the parents were at the bar (Chaplin's) and who (parent or friend) answered the request from MW's for someone to take care of the McCann's crying child? Now I am starting to understanding the McCann's weird emphasis on anniversaries. Another diversion tactic, this one to keep prying eyes off of the 2nd.


Thursday, December 9, 2010

Maria Julia ...the maid who could tell so much

 Again for those who believe Madeleine died the night Mrs Fenn heard a child screaming, the McCanns may have been disturbed Wednesday morning by their panic they would have forgotten about the maid as they were preparing the is very sad Maria Julia was not questioned in more depth..1)the cots, were they always in seperate rooms , or were they together in the room the McCanns slept in ? 2)The bed under the window , was that the bed always 'messed' up? and of course the time ,what time was she there with the McCanns this would indicate why she commented on the children not being present did she think it too early for them to be in the creche? 3)The only time she ever met with the McCanns...does this mean it was odd for them to be in the apartment this time of the morning? 4) it is the greatest of shames Maria Julia was busy May 3th ,because we would then know if both cots were placed together ready for the simulated abduction..5) when Maria mentions the beds she states the bed closest to the door...but she says this about both beds...I would imagine she is speaking about the bed under the window which is why Kate McCann lied and said it was she who slept there.....Maria Julia ,I have so many, many questions for you....

Should the simulated abduction have taken place the night of May 2nd but aborted due to being disturbed.?..had this been the plan they would not have bumped into Jez Wilkins and we would not be here today blogging about the night of May 3rd..


Maria Júlia, the mother of the two sacked employees, handed in her resignation from the Ocean Club, after 16 years of employment. It was she who cleaned for the last time the McCann family apartment,the day before Madeleine disappeared.

Maria Júlia (former Ocean Club employee) – When I went there on Wednesday [2nd May 2007], they were there. It was they who opened the door for me, they told me to come in and then they told me that they were leaving. They even told me something about the balcony… yes… I understood that they were going to the balcony, and even thought they were going to the balcony. But no, they really left. They went out from that door, that door…the door that gives access to the garden [the balcony double glazed door] and that was it, they went out, never again… It was the only time that I was with them.»

and statement at


In regards to her duties directly related to the apartment, she states that the last time she entered there was on the Wednesday, the day before the facts, more precisely on the 02 of May, where she carried out cleaning. Questioned, says that contrary to what has been established, on Thursday, the 03rd, she was doing something else, and did not have the opportunity to pick up the rubbish bags;

. She remembers that when she entered the apartment (A), on Wednesday, that inside she came across the parents. After being allowed to enter, she carried out her work, as they had already left. While she was there, she did not come across any child, supposing that they were in the crèche;

. During the time she carried out her work, she remembers having seen, given the scenario presented, that the couple slept in the room opposite the entrance way, where she came across a children’s cot. This room gives access to an exterior garden which is called the ground floor, and to a veranda. In the room closest to the door of the apartment, there was a bed pushed to the wall (where she assumed the missing child slept) and a second cot. All these beds were ‘messy’ and this told her that they had been used. She states further that in the room closest to the door, was another bed, which was not used;. On the Friday following, the day after the disappearance of the child, she states that due to the police activity, she did not clean Apartment A;

. Questioned, states that on the days preceding the facts, she only entered the apartments to carry out her duties, and did not come across any element/object or strange fact that called her attention and which could be directly related to the disappearance;

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Assange v McCanns v Free speech...

Tonight, an innocent man, who wants to change the World ,sits in a prison cell but we are assured he will not be treated like a prisoner he will be permitted to wear his own clothes and use a telephone. His crime ? trumped up rape allegations for wanting a more transparent world.

On the other side we have the McCanns gagging free speech and still the Gaspar statement prevents Goncalo Amarals book from being published in England.

It is too early to comment on the part Shreni Dewani played in his wifes death but innocent people do not need spin doctors . Max Clifford was put in place the moment Shreni returned to England .

Operation Ore... lost their appeal..Jim Gamble lauding it over anyone who wishes to hear. No one knows Gamble the way we do and I can only imagine how these families are feeling tonight.

It appears in England ONLY the victims are the losers....and the guilty are the winners...who take it all.

McCanns, Deja Vú....Shreni Dewani has been set up...

The alleged order to execute Anni by her husband, appears to be without motive, but Shreni hiring Max Clifford was curious and it is possible he also has an extradition lawyer on board , all the hall marks of the McCanns friends and family... 'they are being set up'...Of course Shreni Dewani may well have fallen into a set up , only time will tell.... as Kate said 'They do not want a murder in Portugal'..oops slip of the tongue...and if Shreni has hired someone like Mr.Caplan, I doubt he will ever be extradited  to South Africa on the word of a taxi driver. Anni I fear, just like Madeleine, will never see justice. Time for Dr Spin to go to work.....

Sunday, December 5, 2010

The last photograph

The last photograph of a very pale Madeleine. I have no idea if it is photoshopped or not, although Gerry's elbow suddenly missing in one photograph of the same image, is a mystery. People go on living until someone tells you otherwise, and I think this is what the groups statements are telling us, they are giving proof with 'their words 'that Madeleine was alive until they were ready to simulate an abduction. The McCanns loved to photograph Madeleine this is clear and the absence of photographs on the fateful holiday give me pause for thought and my thoughts are the reason there are so few is because they had no time, Madeleine may have died a few short days after their arrival. The tennis court photograph , Kate said in her statement Madeleine had  a sunburn mark on her right forearm and in this shot it is clear to see, her arm is marked.

It makes little sense to take your camera with you on holiday and not take photographs, even less sense to take it to the pool and only take one photograph. The McCanns were 'camera snappers' the images we see of their children are many, lots taken on the same day (Donegal and in England) example , Madeleine in the park ,there are several of her and all are on the same day. Therefore, for me, to have only one image of Madeleine on May 3rd is out of character for the McCanns. If Madeleine died the night of May 1st this would also explain the lack of photographs and would imply the last photo of Madeleine was at the tennis court. Phil McCann had this image very early on and e.mailed it along with a chain letter around the world.

There are no images of Kate with her children on this holiday...five days until the evening of May 3rd ? and the 'happy snapper' has nothing to show for it.

Madeleine had her tennis lesson on Tuesday and yet Bridget O'Donnell for some unknown reason in her article  for the Guardian said Madeleines tennis lesson was on Thursday 'She must have been there' she said.
Bridget O'Donnell and Jez were pressured by the McCanns, were they asked to confirm they saw Madeleine on Thursday and was the article written to suggest Madeleine was seen by them...but Bridget only suggested and did not confirm Madeleines presence.

Madeleine pale skinned by the pool.

Madeleine at the tennis court, a red mark shown clearly on her right forearm.

McCanns have taken a massive amount of photographs of Madeleine.

For those who believe Madeleine died before May 3rd

Wednesday and Thursday evenings were alibis....Tuesday May 1st Madeleine heard screaming by Mrs Fenn. Wednesday May 2nd, that evening the group stay longer and move to the cocktail bar away from their table (alibi so they are remembered)...missing is Rachael Oldfield who claims to have been sick. I do not believe in the neglect issue ,I believe Rachael was caring for the children who were all together. Skys reporter Martin Brunt has reported the McCanns were there for the best part of two weeks, this is not true, the group arrived Saturday April 28th, that evening along with the children they went for dinner at the Millenium,.Sunday April 29th, evening, Matt cried off sick, I believe Matt was with the children. Monday April 30th we had another who claimed sickness , again I believe this was the baby sitter. Three nights before disaster struck (if we believe Madeleine died the night Mrs Fenn heard screaming.)

If we remove Saturday evening as the whole group were together with the children we are left with just two evenings.....  ONLY two nights before tragedy struck.   NEGLECT would never have been an issue. PARAISO Beach bar, also 'used' to be seen all together except the McCanns were not there, however there was a very helpful waiter who placed the McCanns there that afternoon , Madeleine dancing with her father. Not true.

Madeleines last dance....

Mr Matias's evidence confirms Madeleine was alive and well at 6pm, when the family left the restaurant.

Below taken from Paulo Reiss

First picture of the Tapas 7 seen together

THIS is the first picture of the Tapas 7 seen together at a beach bar just hours before Maddie was snatched. They were captured on CCTV having drinks before making the 10-minute walk to the restaurant where they met the McCann. The digital time on the film is 5.59pm - about the time Gerry and Kate were picking Maddie up from kids club to get her ready for bed", wrote "The News of The World", on August 10, 2008.

Not very accurate, this time line and description of events. The seven friends didn't go from Paraíso beach bar to meet the McCann in Tapas bar. This is a brief description (*) of the hours between 4:30/5:00 pm up to 8:00 pm, May 3:
1 – The seven friends and children went to the beach, on the afternoon of May 3, at different hours and later, all together, went to Paraíso beach bar,;

2 – They asked food for the children and it was around 5:30 pm when the food arrived;

3 – The men (David, Matthew and Russell) left around 5:55/6:20 pm (1), to go to the tennis court (2), because there was a “men’s social tennis round” that night;

4 – The wives stayed in the Paraíso Bar, because they had asked for ice creams for the kids and the men were late for the “men’s social tennis round” scheduled to start at 6:00 pm;

5 – When the three men arrived at the tennis court, Gerry was there, already, playing;

6 - Kate had been at the tennis court, with Gerry, after 3:30 pm, but she left around 4:30 pm and went jogging on the beach (3). Gerry stayed in the courts, playing with Julian;

7 – The nannies took the children (including the three McCann children) to have “high tea” near the Tapas bar, around 5:00 pm;

8 – Kate finished jogging (5:20/5:30 pm) and met Gerry, who was already with Madeleine, Sean and Amelie near the Tapas Bar. They took the kids,together, to the apartment and Gerry went back to tennis;

9 – Around 6:10/6:15 pm, all the women left Paraíso with the kids and went to the tennis court to see the men playing. They stayed there for some undisclosed time and went to their apartments, around 6:45/7:20 pm;

10 – Gerry asked David Payne (4), around 6:30 pm, to look in on Kate, to see if she needed help to take the kids to the playing area, near Tapas bar;

11 – David knocked at the A5 apartment (4). Kate had just finished having a bath and David saw that the kids were already bathed and were in their pyjamas (5) playing around;

12 – Kate told David the kids were very tired, so they were not going to the playing area (6);

13 – David Payne got his tennis kit and went to the court. He arrived around 7:00 pm and the four men (Gerry, David, Matthew and Russell) started to play, but after a short time Gerry decided he had had enough tennis and went to the apartment. He was replaced by Dan, a tennis coach from Ocean Club;

14 – The three men played until almost 8:00 pm and they went back to their apartments, to get ready for dinner, as the table was reserved for 8:30 pm (7).

(1) Matthew said they left Paraíso at 6:20 pm. Russell said the three men left around 6:00 pm. David also stated 6:00 pm. Fiona said it was 5:55/6:00 pm, when the three men left.

(2) Russell said that he and Matthew went straight to the courts. Matthew said he went to the apartment to get his tennis gear and Russell did the same. David said the other two men went to the apartments and he went to meet Gerry, who was already playing, at the courts.

(3) According to Russell, while the group was at the beach, before going to Paraíso beach bar, they saw Kate doing her jogging near the seaside, at around 5:15/5:20 pm. They didn't talk, some people from the group that was at the beach just waved to Kate. Russell said that David went to his own apartment and also – he believes – to the McCann apartment. Briefly, David came back and joined them, there was Dan with two or three more guests and they played for more than one hour, until 8:00 pm, Russell said. Gerry went back to the apartment a short time before the three men, according to Russell. Dan, the tennis coach, also left earlier.

(4) – It was Gerry who asked him to check on Kate and the kids, Payne told Police. According to Kate, David knocked at the door (the door facing the swimming pool). She just put a towel around her, went to the living room and they had a brief talk. David said he thinks the French doors were open and he went inside the apartment. The kids were there, playing around, and the conversation with Kate was short. David Payne confirmed this was the last time he saw Madeleine.

(5) About the kids, David Payne said they were all dressed in their pyjamas, looked like angels, just at the beginning of his statement to British Police. 41 minutes later, when asked what everybody was wearing, he said he could only remember that the kids were dressed in white. He could not remember what Kate McCann was wearing.

(6) The conversation with Kate was short: 3 to 5 minutes, David Payne said.

(7) According to Fiona Payne, David came back from tennis at 7:10 pm, still in time to help give the children a bath . Diana Webster said her son-in-law helped to bath the children, around 7:10 pm. Matthew Oldfield said that the three men (he, Russell and David) played up to 8:00 pm. Rachael told police that Gerry left at 7:20 pm to help Kate put the children in bed. Russell also said the he, David and Matthew played for almost one hour, close to 8:00 pm and they left the tennis court together.

(*) These details were obtained by cross-referencing information from statements given to Portuguese and British police by the McCann couple, their seven friends and Kate's personal notes. Large time gaps, in some situations, are due to the different times given by the persons questioned.

Duarte Levy and Paulo Reis

Saturday, December 4, 2010

The Express have deleted the Blue bag

Reports that Police were investigating what happened to Gerry McCanns blue tennis bag , large enough to easily conceal a childs body.

There could be a very simple explanation, Gerry played tennis, so having a tennis bag is unsurprising in itself. Skys reporter Martin Brunt confirmed Gerry had a blue bag.

Both Gerry McCann and Clarence  Mitchell strenuously deny there ever was a bag - WHY ?…

Their insistance that nothing was taken from the apartment except Madeleine? If Mitchell-McCann deny Gerry had any such bag you can rest assured he did have one -

A MISSING blue tennis bag could hold the key to Madeleine McCann's disappearance, a TV documentary will claim tonight.

The bag - big enough to carry a small child - belonged to Maddie's dad Gerry, the programme says.
It is claimed Portuguese cops have been hunting for the holdall, which disappeared at the same time as the four-year-old girl.
The bag emerges as a potentially vital new clue in a Sky News investigation entitled The Madeleine McCann Mystery.
Yet, bizarrely, the McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell yesterday denied it existed - saying Gerry did not own such a bag and never had done.

All smiles ... McCanns return from church with twins yesterday
All smiles ... McCanns return from church with twins yesterday
Sky's crime reporter Martin Brunt stood by the documentary's claim last night.

Former detective Tony Rogers, one of Britain's most experienced police officers, will be seen saying: "If it's a bag of a size that could be taking away from the flat a child, that would be of great interest to the investigating officer."

The latest news from Portugal

Thursday, December 2, 2010


Thursday, November 01, 2007

Madeleine McCann. Just the mere mention of a little girl's name is enough to evoke passion and strong emotion among those who never even met her. The name of a tiny, vulnerable toddler is known the world over. Madeleine's name has been spoken more since May 3rd, than it ever was during the few short years of a childhood that has quite likely been stolen forever. Unlike Gerry's treasured possession, his wallet and the cash it contained, it can never be returned.

There are two people responsible for Madeleine's fate - Kate and Gerry McCann. Two parents who it is known, repeatedly took the deliberate decision to leave Madeleine and her siblings alone, unprotected and open to potential harm and danger.

You would think her parents would be despised wouldn't you? that the media would be picking on every word they said, delving without mercy into the backgrounds of two people who put their own hedonistic desires above the welfare of their children. That is what they would normally do. But oh no, not with Kate and Gerry McCann.

Instead, those who speak out against the protected icons of the British establishment, are the victims of the sort of treatment normally reserved for those who commit crimes against children.

We, who are seeking answers, truth and justice - are the villains - not the McCanns.


Why are guests on TV and radio shows gagged by presenters at the first sign of any criticism of the couple? Why are we expected to believe without question, every convoluted, cock-and-bull story presented by the British media? Why is a long standing ally, the victim of racial abuse from a two bit chancer working for the Holy Bible of the Uneducated, Lost and Lonely Loser Brigade?

Poor old Kate, the mother who saw no wrong in leaving a three year old girl all alone, is the victim of abuse and threats and we are supposed to hang our heads in shame.

Don't get me wrong, I do not agree with threats - they only serve to betray Madeleine even more than she has already been betrayed. Justice for Madeleine must be achieved through the justice system, otherwise, there is no justice at all. This is not about revenge, jealousy or spite. It is about doing the right thing for someone who has been the victim of so much wrong.

Why should Kate and Gerry be protected from the sort of abuse we receive on a daily basis? We are not the ones who have done anything wrong?

The press worry about the safety of Kate and Gerry, yet show no interest in the fact that my welfare and safety is being openly discussed on the forum of a national newspaper. They are blind to the threats I have received.


Don't get me wrong, I don't give a tinkers cuss about threats or insults from people I wouldn't give the time of day to. In any case I am used to it. After my attacks on Edgar Ray Killen, it was made quite clear to me that I would never be welcome in Mississippi! It is the difference in attitude that concerns me - and "difference" has been the hallmark of media coverage of the McCanns. No one else except the McCanns would have enjoyed the luxury of such protection.


I honestly feel we will know at least part of answer in the near future, though I doubt we will ever know the full sordid story of fear, protection and called in favours.

Perhaps Kate and Gerry may take a look at this blog and our campaign for answers, and ask themselves,"why"

That I can answer with a few simple truisms.

They betrayed Madeleine. They continue to betray Madeleine. They betrayed the country of my birth. They betrayed the vast majority of British parents who sacrifice their needs for their children.

The Madeleine McCann threads on this blog aim to right those wrongs, to provide a voice for the betrayed, the angry and the frustrated. If anyone reading this can help make our voices be heard even louder, you can email me at

Those who have helped before, will tell you I protect those who have come to our aid. Despite what some may think, I am quite approachable and always answer emails!

There is a lot in my past I regret and that I am ashamed of. This campaign is not one of them.