Monday, December 20, 2010

Max Clifford the Dick Head !!!!!

I am placing this here because,  how I wish someone had had the balls to say these words to Clarence Mitchell in the defence of Madeleine...

Sunday, December 19, 2010

DEWANIS/MCCANNS 'No stone unturned'.

Max Clifford has already related the Dewanis to the McCanns, perfect timing for them to board the gravy train as they whinge and whine how they were also treated this way in Portugal. This would not only help the Dewanis , but Shrenis point blank refusal to return to South Africa,  as the tapas 7, also refused to return to do the reconstruction for fear of being set-up.. The McCanns must be missing the limelight and of course even more the  money....The McCanns never one to think of the 'victim' will have no qualms as to Anni's fate and using her for their own we have seen many times before, Marie luz Cortez....and their own daughter Madeleine.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Wikileaks and why we need them...

McCanns very quick to write on their blog about Wikileaks cables....lets hope it is only a question of time before the Gaspar statement is leaked through the right channels. Question is, will the British media  have the balls to publish? If they do, it is all over for the McCanns.

WIKILEAKS need to somehow, someway have this published in the press...if not in England, find another country, so the truth may be known.

On a seperate note the Telegraph are doing their very best to prove the innocence of Shreni Dewani, innocence is proven in a court of law. If Mr.Dewani is innocent of these alleged charges, then he should want to return to South Africa and prove it, if not for himself, for the parents of Anni ,who will never know a moments peace until the truth is told.

Shrena and Annis last dance....

Kates 'cool million' 'her year of hell'

Thursday, December 16, 2010

McCanns: Scathing book rights will go to the highest your bets

MADELEINE McCann: Kate and Gerry McCann’s book about their daughter has yet to be written but already the reviews are coming in. Philomena McCann, Gerry McCann’s sister, says the work is “truthful and scathing”.

The McCann’s fund is not as full as it once was.

The book will raise monies.

But does it need to be sensationalised?

Isn’t that what the press did what the child went missing, cranking up the single-thread story into a feeding frenzy of libel and accusation?

Here’s Philomena McCann:
“Kate is mainly doing it and I know she has written some very truthful and scathing things relating to the Portuguese police.”
Why focus on them? Did they take Our Maddie? Is this book about revenge for them labelling her an arguido?
When Madeleine went missing we thought it would be really important for Kate to keep a detailed journal and she felt it was important to keep an account of everything and some of it has been used for the book.
“I don’t know if I will be able to read it myself. I have been thinking about it but I think I may find it too upsetting.”
What can be in it that Ms McCann has not already heard or felt? She then adds a rather confusing line:
“Kate and Gerry feel a real responsibility that they don’t want to continue asking the public to support them, and that support has allowed them to go on.”
Anyone understand that?
“They think about what they can do to help themselves and they came up with this idea.”
But how will the book be marketed?

 Is it a whodunit?

 The McCanns are writing the book to raise cash. And, as they say:
“We are hopeful that this book may help the investigation to find Madeleine in other ways too. Our hope is that it may prompt those who have relevant information, knowingly or not, to come forward and share it with our team.”
One day after the book hits the shelves, Prince William and Kate Middleton will marry. The book will not be the thing – rather whichever newspaper serialises it will.

Monday, December 13, 2010


Guardian pick up on the dogs..the Daily Mail true to form do not..sad neither mentioned the Gaspar statement this would have been a perfect opportunity to put a toe in the water.

Friday, December 10, 2010



chaplins bar

We cannot know, at present, whether Chaplins is true or not, but Amaral has promised explosive revelations in his forthcoming book.
parte de um comentário :
"......... The McCann’s went to another restaurant (Chaplin’s) the previous night which was even further away from where they were staying and they left their children alone even at that distance. Chaplin’s is 800 metres more in distance than the 200 metres it takes to get to the Tapas Bar.

MW’s staff had to go and find them and ask the McCann’s to return to their apartment as one of their children had been crying for over an hour and a half. The next day MW’s offered them a babysitter for the night (for free) on the 3rd May and the McCann’s cancelled her services and went to the Tapas Bar which was 200 metres away not 50 yards as the McCann’s have stated). Even after all that crying from their child the previous night, they still left their children alone again the next night. If that is not wilful neglect, what the hell is? "..........
Quiz Night
Would a quiz night attract you? And if so, what night might quiz night be? Why, quiz night isTuesday night!
Chaplins inform us:
“FUN” QUIZ NIGHT every Tuesday, start 10 pm
But, is there any evidence that the tapas 9 enjoyed quizzes? Well, it seems they were not averse to them, for, in relation to the night of 3 May, Sol informs us
An aerobic instructor from the resort entertains the dinner guests at Tapas with a ‘Quiz’. At 9.30 p.m. the game ends, and Gerry invites her to their table, where she stays for half an hour.
Happy Hour
Is there anything that might encourage late evening drinking at Chaplins? Well how about a ‘Happy Hour’
Last year, this was advertised as follows:
Later on in the evening, once the food has finished, Chaplins swings into Bar mode and is soon full of people enjoying the music, the great company and perhaps most of all the Happy Hour (11.30pm - 12.30pm) when all drinks are half price.
Some Thoughts
What is interesting about the Chaplins story, if true, is what hangs from it. From the point of public relations, were it to become media mainstream, it could be extraordinarily damaging to the McCann cause.
The suspicious minded may also ask whether anything more serious than crying occurred.
We cannot know, at present, whether Chaplins is true or not, but Amaral has promised explosive revelations in his forthcoming book. "

Anonymous said...
Paulo, Thanks again for the updates. Over the past two weeks there has been rampant speculation that Maddie died on the night of the 2nd or in the early hours of the 3rd, after her parents had to be dragged out of a bar that was located a mile from the apartment. Can you confirm that the parents were at the bar (Chaplin's) and who (parent or friend) answered the request from MW's for someone to take care of the McCann's crying child? Now I am starting to understanding the McCann's weird emphasis on anniversaries. Another diversion tactic, this one to keep prying eyes off of the 2nd.


Thursday, December 9, 2010

Maria Julia ...the maid who could tell so much

 Again for those who believe Madeleine died the night Mrs Fenn heard a child screaming, the McCanns may have been disturbed Wednesday morning by their panic they would have forgotten about the maid as they were preparing the is very sad Maria Julia was not questioned in more depth..1)the cots, were they always in seperate rooms , or were they together in the room the McCanns slept in ? 2)The bed under the window , was that the bed always 'messed' up? and of course the time ,what time was she there with the McCanns this would indicate why she commented on the children not being present did she think it too early for them to be in the creche? 3)The only time she ever met with the McCanns...does this mean it was odd for them to be in the apartment this time of the morning? 4) it is the greatest of shames Maria Julia was busy May 3th ,because we would then know if both cots were placed together ready for the simulated abduction..5) when Maria mentions the beds she states the bed closest to the door...but she says this about both beds...I would imagine she is speaking about the bed under the window which is why Kate McCann lied and said it was she who slept there.....Maria Julia ,I have so many, many questions for you....

Should the simulated abduction have taken place the night of May 2nd but aborted due to being disturbed.?..had this been the plan they would not have bumped into Jez Wilkins and we would not be here today blogging about the night of May 3rd..


Maria Júlia, the mother of the two sacked employees, handed in her resignation from the Ocean Club, after 16 years of employment. It was she who cleaned for the last time the McCann family apartment,the day before Madeleine disappeared.

Maria Júlia (former Ocean Club employee) – When I went there on Wednesday [2nd May 2007], they were there. It was they who opened the door for me, they told me to come in and then they told me that they were leaving. They even told me something about the balcony… yes… I understood that they were going to the balcony, and even thought they were going to the balcony. But no, they really left. They went out from that door, that door…the door that gives access to the garden [the balcony double glazed door] and that was it, they went out, never again… It was the only time that I was with them.»

and statement at


In regards to her duties directly related to the apartment, she states that the last time she entered there was on the Wednesday, the day before the facts, more precisely on the 02 of May, where she carried out cleaning. Questioned, says that contrary to what has been established, on Thursday, the 03rd, she was doing something else, and did not have the opportunity to pick up the rubbish bags;

. She remembers that when she entered the apartment (A), on Wednesday, that inside she came across the parents. After being allowed to enter, she carried out her work, as they had already left. While she was there, she did not come across any child, supposing that they were in the crèche;

. During the time she carried out her work, she remembers having seen, given the scenario presented, that the couple slept in the room opposite the entrance way, where she came across a children’s cot. This room gives access to an exterior garden which is called the ground floor, and to a veranda. In the room closest to the door of the apartment, there was a bed pushed to the wall (where she assumed the missing child slept) and a second cot. All these beds were ‘messy’ and this told her that they had been used. She states further that in the room closest to the door, was another bed, which was not used;. On the Friday following, the day after the disappearance of the child, she states that due to the police activity, she did not clean Apartment A;

. Questioned, states that on the days preceding the facts, she only entered the apartments to carry out her duties, and did not come across any element/object or strange fact that called her attention and which could be directly related to the disappearance;

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Assange v McCanns v Free speech...

Tonight, an innocent man, who wants to change the World ,sits in a prison cell but we are assured he will not be treated like a prisoner he will be permitted to wear his own clothes and use a telephone. His crime ? trumped up rape allegations for wanting a more transparent world.

On the other side we have the McCanns gagging free speech and still the Gaspar statement prevents Goncalo Amarals book from being published in England.

It is too early to comment on the part Shreni Dewani played in his wifes death but innocent people do not need spin doctors . Max Clifford was put in place the moment Shreni returned to England .

Operation Ore... lost their appeal..Jim Gamble lauding it over anyone who wishes to hear. No one knows Gamble the way we do and I can only imagine how these families are feeling tonight.

It appears in England ONLY the victims are the losers....and the guilty are the winners...who take it all.

McCanns, Deja Vú....Shreni Dewani has been set up...

The alleged order to execute Anni by her husband, appears to be without motive, but Shreni hiring Max Clifford was curious and it is possible he also has an extradition lawyer on board , all the hall marks of the McCanns friends and family... 'they are being set up'...Of course Shreni Dewani may well have fallen into a set up , only time will tell.... as Kate said 'They do not want a murder in Portugal'..oops slip of the tongue...and if Shreni has hired someone like Mr.Caplan, I doubt he will ever be extradited  to South Africa on the word of a taxi driver. Anni I fear, just like Madeleine, will never see justice. Time for Dr Spin to go to work.....

Sunday, December 5, 2010

The last photograph

The last photograph of a very pale Madeleine. I have no idea if it is photoshopped or not, although Gerry's elbow suddenly missing in one photograph of the same image, is a mystery. People go on living until someone tells you otherwise, and I think this is what the groups statements are telling us, they are giving proof with 'their words 'that Madeleine was alive until they were ready to simulate an abduction. The McCanns loved to photograph Madeleine this is clear and the absence of photographs on the fateful holiday give me pause for thought and my thoughts are the reason there are so few is because they had no time, Madeleine may have died a few short days after their arrival. The tennis court photograph , Kate said in her statement Madeleine had  a sunburn mark on her right forearm and in this shot it is clear to see, her arm is marked.

It makes little sense to take your camera with you on holiday and not take photographs, even less sense to take it to the pool and only take one photograph. The McCanns were 'camera snappers' the images we see of their children are many, lots taken on the same day (Donegal and in England) example , Madeleine in the park ,there are several of her and all are on the same day. Therefore, for me, to have only one image of Madeleine on May 3rd is out of character for the McCanns. If Madeleine died the night of May 1st this would also explain the lack of photographs and would imply the last photo of Madeleine was at the tennis court. Phil McCann had this image very early on and e.mailed it along with a chain letter around the world.

There are no images of Kate with her children on this holiday...five days until the evening of May 3rd ? and the 'happy snapper' has nothing to show for it.

Madeleine had her tennis lesson on Tuesday and yet Bridget O'Donnell for some unknown reason in her article  for the Guardian said Madeleines tennis lesson was on Thursday 'She must have been there' she said.
Bridget O'Donnell and Jez were pressured by the McCanns, were they asked to confirm they saw Madeleine on Thursday and was the article written to suggest Madeleine was seen by them...but Bridget only suggested and did not confirm Madeleines presence.

Madeleine pale skinned by the pool.

Madeleine at the tennis court, a red mark shown clearly on her right forearm.

McCanns have taken a massive amount of photographs of Madeleine.

For those who believe Madeleine died before May 3rd

Wednesday and Thursday evenings were alibis....Tuesday May 1st Madeleine heard screaming by Mrs Fenn. Wednesday May 2nd, that evening the group stay longer and move to the cocktail bar away from their table (alibi so they are remembered)...missing is Rachael Oldfield who claims to have been sick. I do not believe in the neglect issue ,I believe Rachael was caring for the children who were all together. Skys reporter Martin Brunt has reported the McCanns were there for the best part of two weeks, this is not true, the group arrived Saturday April 28th, that evening along with the children they went for dinner at the Millenium,.Sunday April 29th, evening, Matt cried off sick, I believe Matt was with the children. Monday April 30th we had another who claimed sickness , again I believe this was the baby sitter. Three nights before disaster struck (if we believe Madeleine died the night Mrs Fenn heard screaming.)

If we remove Saturday evening as the whole group were together with the children we are left with just two evenings.....  ONLY two nights before tragedy struck.   NEGLECT would never have been an issue. PARAISO Beach bar, also 'used' to be seen all together except the McCanns were not there, however there was a very helpful waiter who placed the McCanns there that afternoon , Madeleine dancing with her father. Not true.

Madeleines last dance....

Mr Matias's evidence confirms Madeleine was alive and well at 6pm, when the family left the restaurant.

Below taken from Paulo Reiss

First picture of the Tapas 7 seen together

THIS is the first picture of the Tapas 7 seen together at a beach bar just hours before Maddie was snatched. They were captured on CCTV having drinks before making the 10-minute walk to the restaurant where they met the McCann. The digital time on the film is 5.59pm - about the time Gerry and Kate were picking Maddie up from kids club to get her ready for bed", wrote "The News of The World", on August 10, 2008.

Not very accurate, this time line and description of events. The seven friends didn't go from Paraíso beach bar to meet the McCann in Tapas bar. This is a brief description (*) of the hours between 4:30/5:00 pm up to 8:00 pm, May 3:
1 – The seven friends and children went to the beach, on the afternoon of May 3, at different hours and later, all together, went to Paraíso beach bar,;

2 – They asked food for the children and it was around 5:30 pm when the food arrived;

3 – The men (David, Matthew and Russell) left around 5:55/6:20 pm (1), to go to the tennis court (2), because there was a “men’s social tennis round” that night;

4 – The wives stayed in the Paraíso Bar, because they had asked for ice creams for the kids and the men were late for the “men’s social tennis round” scheduled to start at 6:00 pm;

5 – When the three men arrived at the tennis court, Gerry was there, already, playing;

6 - Kate had been at the tennis court, with Gerry, after 3:30 pm, but she left around 4:30 pm and went jogging on the beach (3). Gerry stayed in the courts, playing with Julian;

7 – The nannies took the children (including the three McCann children) to have “high tea” near the Tapas bar, around 5:00 pm;

8 – Kate finished jogging (5:20/5:30 pm) and met Gerry, who was already with Madeleine, Sean and Amelie near the Tapas Bar. They took the kids,together, to the apartment and Gerry went back to tennis;

9 – Around 6:10/6:15 pm, all the women left Paraíso with the kids and went to the tennis court to see the men playing. They stayed there for some undisclosed time and went to their apartments, around 6:45/7:20 pm;

10 – Gerry asked David Payne (4), around 6:30 pm, to look in on Kate, to see if she needed help to take the kids to the playing area, near Tapas bar;

11 – David knocked at the A5 apartment (4). Kate had just finished having a bath and David saw that the kids were already bathed and were in their pyjamas (5) playing around;

12 – Kate told David the kids were very tired, so they were not going to the playing area (6);

13 – David Payne got his tennis kit and went to the court. He arrived around 7:00 pm and the four men (Gerry, David, Matthew and Russell) started to play, but after a short time Gerry decided he had had enough tennis and went to the apartment. He was replaced by Dan, a tennis coach from Ocean Club;

14 – The three men played until almost 8:00 pm and they went back to their apartments, to get ready for dinner, as the table was reserved for 8:30 pm (7).

(1) Matthew said they left Paraíso at 6:20 pm. Russell said the three men left around 6:00 pm. David also stated 6:00 pm. Fiona said it was 5:55/6:00 pm, when the three men left.

(2) Russell said that he and Matthew went straight to the courts. Matthew said he went to the apartment to get his tennis gear and Russell did the same. David said the other two men went to the apartments and he went to meet Gerry, who was already playing, at the courts.

(3) According to Russell, while the group was at the beach, before going to Paraíso beach bar, they saw Kate doing her jogging near the seaside, at around 5:15/5:20 pm. They didn't talk, some people from the group that was at the beach just waved to Kate. Russell said that David went to his own apartment and also – he believes – to the McCann apartment. Briefly, David came back and joined them, there was Dan with two or three more guests and they played for more than one hour, until 8:00 pm, Russell said. Gerry went back to the apartment a short time before the three men, according to Russell. Dan, the tennis coach, also left earlier.

(4) – It was Gerry who asked him to check on Kate and the kids, Payne told Police. According to Kate, David knocked at the door (the door facing the swimming pool). She just put a towel around her, went to the living room and they had a brief talk. David said he thinks the French doors were open and he went inside the apartment. The kids were there, playing around, and the conversation with Kate was short. David Payne confirmed this was the last time he saw Madeleine.

(5) About the kids, David Payne said they were all dressed in their pyjamas, looked like angels, just at the beginning of his statement to British Police. 41 minutes later, when asked what everybody was wearing, he said he could only remember that the kids were dressed in white. He could not remember what Kate McCann was wearing.

(6) The conversation with Kate was short: 3 to 5 minutes, David Payne said.

(7) According to Fiona Payne, David came back from tennis at 7:10 pm, still in time to help give the children a bath . Diana Webster said her son-in-law helped to bath the children, around 7:10 pm. Matthew Oldfield said that the three men (he, Russell and David) played up to 8:00 pm. Rachael told police that Gerry left at 7:20 pm to help Kate put the children in bed. Russell also said the he, David and Matthew played for almost one hour, close to 8:00 pm and they left the tennis court together.

(*) These details were obtained by cross-referencing information from statements given to Portuguese and British police by the McCann couple, their seven friends and Kate's personal notes. Large time gaps, in some situations, are due to the different times given by the persons questioned.

Duarte Levy and Paulo Reis

Saturday, December 4, 2010

The Express have deleted the Blue bag

Reports that Police were investigating what happened to Gerry McCanns blue tennis bag , large enough to easily conceal a childs body.

There could be a very simple explanation, Gerry played tennis, so having a tennis bag is unsurprising in itself. Skys reporter Martin Brunt confirmed Gerry had a blue bag.

Both Gerry McCann and Clarence  Mitchell strenuously deny there ever was a bag - WHY ?…

Their insistance that nothing was taken from the apartment except Madeleine? If Mitchell-McCann deny Gerry had any such bag you can rest assured he did have one -

A MISSING blue tennis bag could hold the key to Madeleine McCann's disappearance, a TV documentary will claim tonight.

The bag - big enough to carry a small child - belonged to Maddie's dad Gerry, the programme says.
It is claimed Portuguese cops have been hunting for the holdall, which disappeared at the same time as the four-year-old girl.
The bag emerges as a potentially vital new clue in a Sky News investigation entitled The Madeleine McCann Mystery.
Yet, bizarrely, the McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell yesterday denied it existed - saying Gerry did not own such a bag and never had done.

All smiles ... McCanns return from church with twins yesterday
All smiles ... McCanns return from church with twins yesterday
Sky's crime reporter Martin Brunt stood by the documentary's claim last night.

Former detective Tony Rogers, one of Britain's most experienced police officers, will be seen saying: "If it's a bag of a size that could be taking away from the flat a child, that would be of great interest to the investigating officer."

The latest news from Portugal

Thursday, December 2, 2010


Thursday, November 01, 2007

Madeleine McCann. Just the mere mention of a little girl's name is enough to evoke passion and strong emotion among those who never even met her. The name of a tiny, vulnerable toddler is known the world over. Madeleine's name has been spoken more since May 3rd, than it ever was during the few short years of a childhood that has quite likely been stolen forever. Unlike Gerry's treasured possession, his wallet and the cash it contained, it can never be returned.

There are two people responsible for Madeleine's fate - Kate and Gerry McCann. Two parents who it is known, repeatedly took the deliberate decision to leave Madeleine and her siblings alone, unprotected and open to potential harm and danger.

You would think her parents would be despised wouldn't you? that the media would be picking on every word they said, delving without mercy into the backgrounds of two people who put their own hedonistic desires above the welfare of their children. That is what they would normally do. But oh no, not with Kate and Gerry McCann.

Instead, those who speak out against the protected icons of the British establishment, are the victims of the sort of treatment normally reserved for those who commit crimes against children.

We, who are seeking answers, truth and justice - are the villains - not the McCanns.


Why are guests on TV and radio shows gagged by presenters at the first sign of any criticism of the couple? Why are we expected to believe without question, every convoluted, cock-and-bull story presented by the British media? Why is a long standing ally, the victim of racial abuse from a two bit chancer working for the Holy Bible of the Uneducated, Lost and Lonely Loser Brigade?

Poor old Kate, the mother who saw no wrong in leaving a three year old girl all alone, is the victim of abuse and threats and we are supposed to hang our heads in shame.

Don't get me wrong, I do not agree with threats - they only serve to betray Madeleine even more than she has already been betrayed. Justice for Madeleine must be achieved through the justice system, otherwise, there is no justice at all. This is not about revenge, jealousy or spite. It is about doing the right thing for someone who has been the victim of so much wrong.

Why should Kate and Gerry be protected from the sort of abuse we receive on a daily basis? We are not the ones who have done anything wrong?

The press worry about the safety of Kate and Gerry, yet show no interest in the fact that my welfare and safety is being openly discussed on the forum of a national newspaper. They are blind to the threats I have received.


Don't get me wrong, I don't give a tinkers cuss about threats or insults from people I wouldn't give the time of day to. In any case I am used to it. After my attacks on Edgar Ray Killen, it was made quite clear to me that I would never be welcome in Mississippi! It is the difference in attitude that concerns me - and "difference" has been the hallmark of media coverage of the McCanns. No one else except the McCanns would have enjoyed the luxury of such protection.


I honestly feel we will know at least part of answer in the near future, though I doubt we will ever know the full sordid story of fear, protection and called in favours.

Perhaps Kate and Gerry may take a look at this blog and our campaign for answers, and ask themselves,"why"

That I can answer with a few simple truisms.

They betrayed Madeleine. They continue to betray Madeleine. They betrayed the country of my birth. They betrayed the vast majority of British parents who sacrifice their needs for their children.

The Madeleine McCann threads on this blog aim to right those wrongs, to provide a voice for the betrayed, the angry and the frustrated. If anyone reading this can help make our voices be heard even louder, you can email me at

Those who have helped before, will tell you I protect those who have come to our aid. Despite what some may think, I am quite approachable and always answer emails!

There is a lot in my past I regret and that I am ashamed of. This campaign is not one of them.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Only the 'Insane' ...would question the Smarts

I have only just come across the blog of Helene Davies-Greene and how she  had to go public to defend herself for stating the obvious , Madeleine Beth was not abducted and the slander she had to support because of her right to free speech.
 It has now come to pass that a certain blogger who is 100% behind the McCanns involvement in this case, but not on another issue , which is also blatant fraud ,the 'Smarts'. It appears one must be insane not to believe Elizabeth but not insane to not believe the McCanns. I wonder if this blogger also believes the Ramsey story? Or is one insane to think the parents were involved in JonBenets death?

The only comments permitted on public forums in the States are from  Salt Lake City Mormons, which is why others have opened their own blogs to discuss this bizarre story , a 'story' that  does not add up and must be questioned.

The Ramsey and McCann cases,  now hold very little public interest. Both cases are only of interest to the accused (McCanns) of harming their children, their accomplices and those they pay to deny it . The Ramsey book written to slander the Police and show them as inept but most important to portray their innocence , looks like the template for the McCanns as Aunt Phill has already informed us.

The questioning of ones sanity because one chooses to question all three of these very bizarre tales, is an individuals right and a practicing Mormon has no right to tell others what they should or should not think even though their religion leaves them to believe they are ' superior' to the rest of us.

Friday, November 26, 2010

Madeleine Beth has not died in vain

She has been very important in showing the British people that innocence is betrayed everyday, by adults, children love and trust the most.

Robert and Jennifer Murat... and their very strange behaviour

Processos VI
1581 to 1584
Witness Statement of Maria Cecilia Pereira PiresDate: 2007.05.23

Profession: Journalist for Portugal Resident

She has been a journalist for about 16 years, but has worked for the above-referenced paper for about one month.

Questioned, responds that on the 4th of May, 2007, she was asked to go to Praia da Luz, Lagos, in order to cover the case of a missing child.

She clarifies that she was informed that the disappearance of the child occurred in the Mark Warner Ocean Club resort, and that the family/child’s family surname was McCann.

She responds that when she arrived at Praia da Luz around 09H30/10H00, and as she headed to the GNR post where she gathered some information, she then headed next to a group of journalists where she learnt further case details.

Because so little time had passed since the disappearance, she took the decision to walk around the area of the resort.

She adds that this decision was also made due to the information that the child may have left the apartment of her own accord, and may still be in the immediate area.

During her walk, she came across a bare patch of land, situated north, a few meters from the resort. She met a male individual, about 50 years in age, who approached her and asked if she was involved in the [read organized?] search for the missing child.

The deponent told him that she was not, even though she confirmed that she was looking, in order to calm her conscience a bit.

In this context, the individual proposed that both of them head towards a house, apparently unlived in, but not abandoned, with the intent of looking for the child, and so it would not appear like trespassing.

After entering the parking area of the residence, where they called out to see if anyone was home, they verified that a woman was inside. This was a woman of advanced age, around 70 years old, 1,5 to 1,6 metres in height, with grey hair combed and coiffed in the shape of a “banana”. The individual with the deponent asked this older woman to help them search for this child. This older woman agreed.

She clarifies that the individual headed toward the pool zone and the deponent, accompanied by the older woman, lagged behind as the older woman walked slowly.

During this time, the older woman exclaimed to the deponent that she was bothered with the entire situation of the disappearance and further commented that the parents had to be going through great anguish.
The above conversation occurred in English, with the older woman indicating that she lived about 100 metres from the resort, and that the night prior she noticed the arrival of the police due to their sirens. This was around 22H00.

The woman in question told her that she had been having dinner with her son when she heard the sirens, and assumes that it was at this time that the disappearance was noted.

She clarifies that the older woman did not speak about a ‘child or a boy child’ and specifically mentioned “a girl child”. The deponent did not find this strange because by that time, May 4th, everyone knew it was a girl child that had gone missing.

The woman above also indicated that her son was working with the police in trying to locate the child.
She adds that after searching the area around the residence where they found nothing, (the same can be said for the pool neat the house), they were stopped by a neighbor. From what she could make out, he was German but asked them in English what was going on, and then after responded that the Police had been searching the area with dogs.

During the conversation with the older woman, the deponent was introduced to this individual. The deponent confirmed that she was a journalist. The other individual told them that he was searching for the child. The deponent then left the area and the other individuals staying behind.

This situation appeared to her very normal.

She responds that during her work, she came to know the son of the older woman. The journalists referred to him as Robert Murat. He was someone who was involved with the journalists and police with much freedom. He spoke both English and Portuguese.

She states that on the 5th of May, the British journalists affirmed that Robert Murat was one of the suspects in the missing child case. He appeared very much surprised at this and confirmed that he was going to back-off so that he would not be the subject of such comments. Following this point, it was very difficult to contact him.

She clarifies that when she saw the pictures at the information kiosk operated by Robert’s mother, she was certain that his mother was the same one she had met on the 4th.

She responds that when she read the notices, offered by Robert’s mother, she was taken aback by one sentence. That sentence read that the child had gone missing at 07H00 on the 4th of May. This information was supposedly proffered as a result of a telephone call she received. As a result, she set up the information kiosk. The deponent found this strange, given what had occurred between her and this woman on the 4th of May.

She affirms that she became aware of the name of the older woman from newspapers. On the day she initially met her (the 4th of May) this older woman did not identify herself.

She adds that she has many times pondered this situation but always thought it was of no significance. Only today and when she saw what was written did she decide to communicate the fact. She knows with absolute certainty that this older woman was aware of the disappearance given what this older woman had stated to her the morning of May 4th.

Because she is asked, the deponent responds that she bears no grudge against these individuals who she has never seen before. She is certain that this appears an attempt to construct an alibi. There is incongruence between what the older women is stating regarding the 4th and what can be read in the newspapers of today (23 of May, 2007). She felt it her obligation to communicate these facts to the authorities.

And nothing more was said.

Reads, ratifies and signs.


COMMENT: The 'sound of sirens', seem to be some kind of alibi for the Murats. However, SKY News reporter Martin Brunt asked everyone who searched the night of May 3rd and no one heard a siren.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Thoughts of sedation

Thoughts of sedation, always for me, the reason the McCanns could not afford a PM.  But now it has been confirmed JonBenet was molested over a period of time something much more chilling could and would have been revealed. Also a neighbour heard a piercing scream she claimed could have only come from JonBenet, which makes me think of Mrs Fenn and a childs cries that concerned her so much she called her friend. The deleted calls show Kate was in the apartment 15 minutes before Madeleine started crying.
I can no longer feel this is just a simple accident covered up because they sedated their child over of a sleep disorder. Medical records, why were they held back? The heavy lawyers and Goverment involved makes no sense , the McCanns are leading the press around by the nose. The parents still in the driving seat and still calling the shots. The more I read the Ramsey story ,the clearer the picture and I do not like where my thoughts are taking me. .

(10) The ME's examine revealed that there was scaring on JonBenet's uterus that could only have come from ongoing sexual molestation/abuse. Blue FIBERS were found in the VAGINA that did not match anything in the house. There were CELLULOSE Particles in the VAGINA as well, possibly from a paint brush handle. The coroner, Dr. John Meyer, found evidence of sexual assault from the previous night: a small abrasion and small amounts of blood in both her underwear and vagina.  Three medical experts consulting for the police say that the injuries were also consistent with prior sexual abuse. A black light helped reveal that her body had been wiped clean but that a residue of blood was left on her thighs. Dr. Robert Kirschner of the University of Chicago's pathology department went even further, pointing out that her vaginal opening was twice the normal size for six-year-olds. He stated, "The genital injuries indicate penetration,  not only (previously) by a penis, but by another instrument and are evidence of molestation that night as well as previous molestation." "If she had been taken to a hospital emergency room, and doctors had seen the genital evidence, her father would have been arrested."

McCanns and the Media Blackout

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Elizabeth the day she was found

Paints quite a different picture....when you look at Mitchell, Wanda and Elizabeth and how they all looked when they met.

Monday, November 22, 2010

BBC Whitewashing the death of Madeleine

Many thanks to Nigel Moore for the video of last nights BBC Farce.

Did we expect any less than complete propaganda from the BBC. This time they even produced the un bleeped version of where Dr.Amaral they claim said'Fuck the McCanns' also implying Amaral was the only officer involved in the case and he made the McCanns suspects all by himself. Profiler Lee Rainbow left out of the equation . Biased reporting on the Madeleine Foundation was expected and implying there are only nineteen people who do not believe the McCanns 'story' of abduction is farcical. It was unfortunate that a member chose to hind behind a concrete block which gave the 'reporter' and I use the term lightly ,a chance to take the piss. Young girls chosen to be interviewed and chew bubblegum for a living, have no knowledge of the police files or even how to use a computer by the looks of them, a mouse is to be fed interest in Madeleine or what became of her .. Debbie Butler, was rather spiteful I thought and knowing this was important to the cause could maybe have not thrown Tony Bennet to the wolves at this juncture but have swallowed her pride all for the sake of Madeleine. But she is a woman .I am not going to say scorned but sadly this is the impression she gave.

Until the Gaspar statement becomes public knowledge, little housewives like we saw in this farce from the BBC shall remain ignorant. Now ask a housewife to read Katerina Gaspars thoughts, and then ask what she feels about the McCanns and their will be OMG, OMG I did not know this OMG...and that is the reaction you would have received on BBC TV..this of course would have been removed before going to air.

Just out of interest you may like to know most of my readers are from Singapore, Mexico, Russia,Germany and South Korea.

Cheer up Tony, I have left a link on the JonBenet case and they had a body but with political intervention the case was never solved....however Patsy, the mom is dead and the case has now been re-opened, all eyes are on JonBenets brother Burke and what he knows. Burke is being treated with kid gloves, he was there that night and he maybe knows something he was afraid to say at the time, he has been given a number if he ever wants to talk.

The BBC are fools and because of their witch-hunt tactics could not mention Operation Oreor report on the  court hearing.

I wonder if Tony Bennett could have a chat with Louise Shorter, maybe she can find a way to get some reporting of the Police files into the press , it is a long shot but worth a try. Louise claims to believe in Justice, lets see if she will put her money where her mouth is. I understand the McCanns in the eyes of the law are innocent because they have not been charged. The Ramseys, also, but with a lot of political pressure...who the hell sits and writes a five page ramson note in the home ...many , many questions but political meddling shuts many mouths and money talks, it also buys silence.

Letter of resignation, Americas Goncalo Amaral....


Please note: I have only just finished this transcript and have not had time to go over it for grammatical/spelling errors yet, I'll be doing that in the morning.

Opening words: Hello, tonight Inside Out is at Rothley in Leicestershire to ask, who are the Madeleine Foundation?

Voice over: The three year old’s parents say, they just add to their anquish.

Kate: There’s a certain group out there who...this is their job to pick on a vulnerable family and I’m sure after us they’ll move onto another family

East Midlands

Voice over: They’ve been described as a club for Sicko’s to distribute vile leaflets. Their members insist they’re only trying to discover what happened to Madeleine McCann, but the parents of the missing youngster say the so-called Madeleine Foundation is hindering the search for their daughter and adding to their anguish. Simon Hare has been investigating.

Simon Hare: Well, it’s a Saturday afternoon and most people are busy enjoying their weekend, but somewhere here in Nottingham a group of people have got together to discuss the Madeleine McCann case.
(cuts into Simon answering mobile phone...Hello, Simon...)

Simon Hare (voice over) : Secrecy surrounds what’s been billed as the annual conference of the self appointed Madeleine Foundation. They said I can attend, but I have to wait for news of the location. I’m told to make my way to a hotel with conference facilities, but this proves to be just the meeting place. I’m then taken to the real venue .... a room in this village hall in Nuttall.

A member takes some photos, including one of me. Chairman Grenville Green from Nottingham is also happy to be pictured and the organisations’ secretary and co-founder, Tony Bennett, is keen to promote his new book made up of selected extracts from the case files.

There were 19 people at the meeting and I was told that they’d come from all over the country and that one couple had even come from Northern France. Er, they didn’t want camera’s to come in, but they did allow me to sit there and take notes, they discussed many aspects of the McCann case and they also sold me a copy of their new book (“The Madeleine McCann Case Files – Volume 1”)

But at the moment I still don’t feel I’m any nearer to understanding exactly what the Madeleine Foundation is about.

Cuts into an old interview: Well among those reporters was Simon Hare for East Midlands Today, he’s with us now from Portugal...(fades out)

Simon Hare: But I do know something about the Madeleine McCann case. I was part of the East Midlands Today team that covered the events in Portugal. I interviewed the McCanns in Praia da Luz.

Cuts into old footage of Kate McCann: It really does give you great strength really to see everybody in the village, you know, giving us their support and love and everything

Simon Hare: 3 months later I was in Portamao when they were made official suspects

Cuts into footage of Simon Hare at Portamao: The crowd of onlookers, hundreds of people turned out, many booed Kate McCann as she arrived here. (fades out)

Simon Hare: A development largely thanks to this man (shows footage of Goncalo Amaral arriving at the courts) the Portuguese detective, Goncalo Amaral. But he was taken off the case and in 2008, the McCanns had their suspect status removed.

Cuts into film footage of Kate McCann: We welcome the news today although it’s no cause for celebration ...(fades out)

Simon Hare: And won libel damages from some of the more lurid press coverage they’d received.
A year later, front page news of a different kind, thanks to the Madeleine Foundation.

Cuts into footage: people living in Madeleine McCanns home village say that they are sickened that they’re now being targeted by a campaign to reopen a case against her parents.

Male: A group claiming to want justice for Madeleine says it believes she wasn’t abducted. It’s been sending hundreds of leaflets around the area calling for support.

Simon Hare: It delivered a 150 leaflets to the homes in the McCanns own neighbourhood, repeating the now discredited Amaral theory that Madeleine had died in her parents holiday apartment and they’d covered it up.
Cuts into a female journalist holding a leaflet: And the people here in Rothley who spoke to us today say they’re horrified.

Man in street: It’s absolutely repugnant I think personally.

Woman in street: I just think it’s sad and sick that people have got nothing else better to do with their time.
(Note, the documentary failed to interview those from Rothley who thought the leaflet was informative and joined the Madeleine Foundation after searching out more details.)

Simon Hare: I would meet all of the four people who delivered the leaflets that day. Among them, Debbie Butler the Foundations former Chairman and co-founder who appeared on the BBC to justify their actions.
Cut into footage of Debbie Butler: It’s a Nationwide campaign, we need to put the leaflet into as many doors as possible ...(fades out)

Simon Hare: She’s since fallen out with Tony Bennett and is no longer a member of the Foundation, but she agreed to meet me near her home in Kent.

Debbie Butler: Mr Bennett decided that we would go to that area. I’d never been there, he’d been there before, I found out that he had been there before, erm, he knew where we were going, I drove, we had Grenville Green with us and Helene Davies, his wife. We visited the farm that Kate had taken the children to and had some lunch there. Mr Bennett leafleted there alone and instructed me to go and leaflet in the immediate area where the McCanns live, erm, which I did with Helene and then he told me I must leaflet their road, which I did...I was doing it with Helene but Helene...Helene’s legs just went to jelly and she wouldn’t do it, so I did. I didn’t leaflet their own home at all.

Simon Hare: Tony Bennett denies he told Debbie Butler what to do that day but both were subsequently pursued by the McCanns lawyers and in the November last year, Mr Bennett assured the High Court he wouldn’t distribute any more of the leaflets or he could lose £50,000 and even go to prison for contempt of court.

Cuts into BBC footage of Tony Bennett setting up placards “What really happened to Madeleine McCann” and handing out leaflets to members of the public as they passed.

Interesting the background song to this clip “I don’t care, I don’t care, I don’t care what the people may say about me...”

Simon Hare: But by this summer Tony Bennett was distributing a new leaflet. He’s come to Bristol to what’s billed as the Goncalo Amaral Awareness Day. He’s accompanied by another Madeleine Foundation member who’s a little camera shy.

Cuts into film footage of the member hiding behind a post. Simon joking tells her he’s going around this side of the pillar

Tony Bennett: People think we are representing the McCanns in some way....

Simon Hare: Doesn’t that worry you?

Tony Bennett: Erm, not really no because it’s a chance to explain to people erm what we’re about and that there is a big mystery at the heart of this.

Cuts into film clip of woman on the street: I wouldn’t dare say what I thought – Id’ be sued! (laughs)

Cuts into film clip an elderly couple

Tony Bennett: People will no doubt be reading that leaflet as they pass around the town. Not one person’s come back to me to complain at all and say this is outrageous

Simon Hare: But in the afternoon there are a number of hostile reactions

Cuts into film footage of a group of children (you’ll have to watch the video to get the gist of what the children are saying)

Cuts into film footage of a young male adult: I think it’s a bit disrespectful

Cuts into film footage of a woman on the street: I have a two year old daughter you know, if I’d, If I’d lost my daughter like that woman has I wouldn’t want to think someone was out saying that in the street.

Simon Hare: A few days later after hundreds of copies have been handed out, he (Tony Bennett) agrees to the McCanns lawyers’ demands not to distribute this latest leaflet.

They (the McCanns) didn’t want to talk to us about Tony Bennett’s campaign, but on the third anniversary of Madeleine’s disappearance, Kate and Gerry McCann seemed to allude to the Foundation.

GMTV presenter: You know to this day there are people convinced you had something to do with it, how on earth do you deal with that?

Kate: Well, erm...well I think it’s changed erm, certainly we don’t get the same level of criticism that we did and even then to be fair it was the minority really, I think most people...even if, you know, they don’t agree with...with..., you know, what we did, then they wouldn’t feel it right or fair to add to our suffering.

Gerry begins to talk: I think...

Kate cuts in: But having said that I think it’s just a small minority now and you know there’s a certain group there how, this is their job really, is to pick on a vulnerable family and I’m sure after us they’ll move onto another family.

Cuts into BBC footage of Tony Bennett.

Simon Hare: I think she meant you

Tony Bennett: Er, I didn’t hear that. I don’t know whether she meant us or not but erm we are focused on this particular case, focused on the truth so are the members and supporters of the Madeleine Foundation exactly the same. I haven’t got any history of persuing any individuals

Simon Hare: Tony Bennett previously tried and failed to bring a private prosecution against the McCanns for child neglect.

In 2006 he attempted to mount a prosecution of Michael Barrymore in relation to the night Stuart Lubbock died at the TV entertainers’ home. Another high profile case at the centre of a media frenzy. Tony Bennett first came into prominence by taking direct action over the metrification of signs.

Tony Bennett: A lot of people don’t want to see metres and kilometres on our roadsigns

Simon Hare: A course which won a lot of support. He then began removing road signs to campaign for the introduction of old county boundaries

Tony Bennett: I think the majority of the public would like to see these signs ‘Welcome to Lancashire’ on the correct Lancashire boarder.

Simon Hare: Unlike some of his Madeleine Foundation colleagues, he appears to quite like the camera’s notoriety. Last year he could be clearly seen sat behind Gerry McCann as he gave evidence to a Parliamentary subcommittee on the Press and Privacy. Tony Bennett later posted on the internet:
“It was to send out a quiet message. We are looking over his shoulder, checking out what he and his team are saying. Watching.”

Tony Bennett: If it is certain she was abducted then we are (can’t work out what this word is) to their anguish

Simon Hare: And does, does that not bother you? I mean you’re a father, a grandfather.

Tony Bennett: Erm, I’m persuaded that there are still questions to be answered and, and er, as I say I’ve got to be careful what I say, but then I do question their version of events and whether in fact Madeleine was abducted as do many other people.

Simon Hare: but you don’t know what happened; I don’t know what happened...

Tony Bennett: No I don’t...

Simon Hare: And only those responsible truly know

Tony Bennett: I agree. I agree. We don’t know what happened so why can’t we say erm you know, why can’t we ... I mean after all if I’m making bad points, if we’re making points on our website er they can be challenged and refuted easily can’t they.

Simon Hare: The internet is awash with forums and message boards about Madeleine. Some of these sites have seen threats of violence made towards the McCanns and their family home here at Rothley. Inside Out understands that the police have become involved in the past. People who post on these forums describe themselves as ‘Pro’ and ‘Anti’ McCann. Those connected with the Madeleine Foundation have also been subject to threats.

Debbie Butler: Half past twelve one night my phone rang and er I was told I’d be stabbed in front of my son straight through my heart. I phoned the police...erm...I’ve had other threats

Cuts into footage of Tony Bennett with a Madeleine Foundation member walking through the streets.

Simon Hare: The Madeleine Foundation has come to London. They’re delivering more letters to both the Portuguese and British Governments.

Tony Bennett and three members stand outside 10 Downing Street for photos.

Tony Bennett: So what happens? We knock on the door and someone comes and receives it? Okay.

Simon Hare: The latest leaflet that they’d agreed to stop distributing has made a comeback.

Tony Bennett: Well we’ve had a rethink on that and we see no reason why we shouldn’t distribute it. We weren’t threatened with any libel action or anything like that. We erm, we took a decision three months ago not to distribute it but we’ve reconsidered and see no reason why shouldn’t distribute it, especially on Goncalo Amaral’s birthday.

Simon Hare: But in July the McCanns lawyers, Carter Ruck, had threatened to take Tony Bennett back to the High Court. They’re letter felt that the former solicitor had failed to grasp how libel laws work. And it said that they’d also pursue any other members of the Foundation who delivered the leaflets.

The two remaining Rothley leafleters didn’t go to London. Grenville Green and his wife Helene Davies-Green have stepped down from the Foundation Committee after she was described by the Sun as a ‘Sicko’ who distributes vile leaflets.

Cuts into BBC filming of Helene in the kitchen preparing wild mushrooms.

Simon Hare: She was back in the public eye when she stood as a UKIP candidate in the general election.

Helene Davies-Green: Apparently throwing out the odd insult isn’t breaking their code of conduct.
Cuts into film footage of Grenville Green in Portugal

Simon Hare: It’s an example of free speech that her husband doesn’t like. At the beginning of the year, Grenville Green went to Portugal to attend a court hearing about Goncalo Amaral’s controversial book (The Truth in the Lie)

Grenville Green talking to Sky cameras: Why am I here? It’s freedom of speech isn’t it. If someone has a difference of opinion to someone else er you shouldn’t have lots of money to close you down and shut you up and keep you quiet if you’ve got a difference of opinion, this is why we’re here. It’s freedom of speech; freedom of expression.

Film footage of Journalist asks Goncalo a question as he leaves the Portuguese courts: Is your book hurting the McCanns sir?

Goncalo speaks in Portuguese (presumably "pardon?")

Journalist repeats his question: Is your book hurting the McCanns?

Goncalo Amaral then says the words which have become a controversial subject of whether he swore or said something in his native tongue. Sky News correspondent, Martin Brunt, clears this mystery on his blog 'Life of Crime': “Fala com McCanns” which means “Ask the McCanns”.

Grenville Green: This man is a folk hero, a sort of modern day Robin Hood if you will. It’s like a David and Goliath fight. If something’s right, you know it’s right. If something’s wrong, you know it’s wrong.

Cuts into BBC filming of Tony Bennet: There are always going to be those who entirely believe the McCanns account and who regard me as evil and perverted for what I’m doing. On the other hand there are those who have got legitimate questions and fully support what we’re doing.

Cuts into film footage of McCanns posing for the cameras

Simon Hare: Earlier this month, the McCanns launched an online petition calling for an investigation into their daughter’s disappearance to be independently reviewed (Note: The McCanns have NOT requested an investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine; they merely want a review of the case.)

Cuts into video footage of Gerry and Kate McCann.

Gerry Mccann: there’s absolutely no evidence that Madeleine has been seriously harmed so without her we’ve got to believe we can still find her. Erm, it’s difficult, we know that and that’s why we’re asking for help, we need assistance and the authorities need to do more.

Cuts into film footage of Simon Hare: Last week the McCanns revealed that they are now writing their own book. In a statement on their website Kate McCann said “My reason for writing is simple, to give an account of the truth.” Just like that GMTV interview, I can’t help but feel that that was partly aimed at the Madeleine Foundation.

The McCann Diario

Sunday, November 21, 2010

England prepare thy self....because it is going to happen

Smarts on set of TV movie

CBS to wrap up shooting Oct. 2; film to air this fall

Published: Monday, Sept. 22, 2003 12:00 a.m. MDT
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia — On a quiet street just outside the downtown area here, a man is making a plea for his daughter to be returned safely after she was kidnapped less than 24 hours earlier.
"Please bring her home . . . please!" the man exclaims with tears in his eyes.
As the man walks away from scores of reporters and photographers there is suddenly another voice in the background, this time a director yelling, "Cut!"
Sitting next to the director and watching with his head resting in his hand is the Utahn whom the actor that just finished the scene was portraying: Ed Smart.

Ed and Lois Smart arrived Sunday on the set of the made-for-TV movie "The Elizabeth Smart Story." The movie has been shooting for about three weeks and is scheduled to wrap up Oct. 2. CBS will air the movie this fall. An exact date is expected to be announced this week.

Elizabeth Smart stayed in Utah and did not travel to Nova Scotia with her parents.
Sunday afternoon, crews filmed the emotional first press conference Ed Smart held after his daughter was abducted in June 2002.

"It's almost like I couldn't watch it. It did seem very real," said Smart after watching the scene. "The red eyes and tears looked good."

That day was the start of an emotional nine-month roller coaster for the entire Smart family. Both Ed and Lois admit it's been tough having to relive it through numerous interviews as the movie script and a book that is scheduled to come out next month were written.

In fact, both the Smarts said they weren't interested in making a movie or writing a book after Elizabeth was found. They had hoped her return to them would be the end of their time in the media spotlight.
"It wasn't that way, and it hasn't been that way since," Lois Smart said.

Both the movie and the book are being told from the point of view of Ed and Lois. Although there has been some criticism of the Smarts for signing a book and movie deal, both say they didn't want to risk someone else telling their story and getting it wrong or putting out a sensationalized version.

"If we didn't do it, then someone else would do it and who better to tell the story than those who have lived it?" Lois Smart asked rhetorically.

Although the movie is being told from her parents' point of view, there were a few points that Elizabeth wanted to add while the script was being written.

For example, Lois Smart said Elizabeth has a response for those who wondered why she didn't try to escape from her abductor.

Read more ....