Reading through Dr. Martins latest article I am in no doubt he is unaware of the events that are alleged to have taken place during the holiday.....McCann quote "there's no way she... she could have got out on her own.".......all together now ' 'oh yes there is'.... and there appear to be witnesses to prove it !
http://steelmagnolia-mccannarchives.blogspot.com.es/2011/06/danny-collins-madeleine-wanderer.html
AND for McCann to have had to admit that in his police statement he was well aware there were witnesses to the event beyond his manipulative control who may have spoken with the PJ.
EXCLUSIVE to http://www.mccannfiles.com/
By Dr Martin Roberts
26 March 2012
EPILOGUE
Have you heard the one about the man intercepted at the airport, just prior to boarding, with a bomb in his luggage? When asked to explain himself he says calmly, 'the odds of there being a bomb on board the plane are 100,000 to one. The odds that there are two bombs are double that.'
Unfortunately a double indemnity does not necessarily make a situation twice as safe.
In the course of their most recent public outing (on Swedish T.V. this time), the McCanns, not asking for money (cough!) but, like students sitting their 'mocks,' and with script nicely rehearsed, repeated their by now well practised answers, which included Kate's "Yeah, absolutely, there's no way a young child could have got out."
This is clearly an agreed position, as Clarence Mitchell, representing both parents, has previously suggested:
"Kate and Gerry know Mad... know their daughter well enough to know she didn't wander out of the apartment, as has often been speculated."
Gerry McCann has said exactly the same thing, using exactly the same pivotal phrase ('no way'):
"there's no way she... she could have got out on her own."
'No way' is the contemporary equivalent of 'impossible' (not 'unlikely,' 'with difficulty,' or any other imprecise term). It is absolute.
Over a year ago now the question of Madeleine's impediment was discussed (see article: Just Listen, McCannFiles, 5 Feb., 2011). It turns out not to have been the open patio door per se. That being so, we can offer the McCanns 'double indemnity' and, hypothetically lock that door for them without changing the situation. There is still 'no way' Madeleine could have got out on her own.
Why not? What was there to stop her turning left instead of right and leaving through the unlocked front door, as opposed to the supposedly unlocked patio door, even if the latter had been locked? Nothing in principle, as the considered thoughts of Russell O’Brien confirm:
"We were conscious that, that, erm, if you, you only do one lock on the main door then it can be opened from the inside."
In practice however, leaving through a locked door without the key would have been impossible. There is 'no way' Madeleine McCann could have left 5A spontaneously under such circumstances. So, supposing that she was perfectly well, as the McCanns have insisted all along, then the only true obstacle to her freedom was the locked front door, not the open patio. And that of course means, as has most recently been argued, that the abductor was stuck inside also.
http://steelmagnolia-mccannarchives.blogspot.com.es/2011/06/danny-collins-madeleine-wanderer.html
AND for McCann to have had to admit that in his police statement he was well aware there were witnesses to the event beyond his manipulative control who may have spoken with the PJ.
EXCLUSIVE to http://www.mccannfiles.com/
By Dr Martin Roberts
26 March 2012
EPILOGUE
Have you heard the one about the man intercepted at the airport, just prior to boarding, with a bomb in his luggage? When asked to explain himself he says calmly, 'the odds of there being a bomb on board the plane are 100,000 to one. The odds that there are two bombs are double that.'
Unfortunately a double indemnity does not necessarily make a situation twice as safe.
In the course of their most recent public outing (on Swedish T.V. this time), the McCanns, not asking for money (cough!) but, like students sitting their 'mocks,' and with script nicely rehearsed, repeated their by now well practised answers, which included Kate's "Yeah, absolutely, there's no way a young child could have got out."
This is clearly an agreed position, as Clarence Mitchell, representing both parents, has previously suggested:
"Kate and Gerry know Mad... know their daughter well enough to know she didn't wander out of the apartment, as has often been speculated."
Gerry McCann has said exactly the same thing, using exactly the same pivotal phrase ('no way'):
"there's no way she... she could have got out on her own."
'No way' is the contemporary equivalent of 'impossible' (not 'unlikely,' 'with difficulty,' or any other imprecise term). It is absolute.
Over a year ago now the question of Madeleine's impediment was discussed (see article: Just Listen, McCannFiles, 5 Feb., 2011). It turns out not to have been the open patio door per se. That being so, we can offer the McCanns 'double indemnity' and, hypothetically lock that door for them without changing the situation. There is still 'no way' Madeleine could have got out on her own.
Why not? What was there to stop her turning left instead of right and leaving through the unlocked front door, as opposed to the supposedly unlocked patio door, even if the latter had been locked? Nothing in principle, as the considered thoughts of Russell O’Brien confirm:
"We were conscious that, that, erm, if you, you only do one lock on the main door then it can be opened from the inside."
In practice however, leaving through a locked door without the key would have been impossible. There is 'no way' Madeleine McCann could have left 5A spontaneously under such circumstances. So, supposing that she was perfectly well, as the McCanns have insisted all along, then the only true obstacle to her freedom was the locked front door, not the open patio. And that of course means, as has most recently been argued, that the abductor was stuck inside also.
