We now know thanks to Kate, the children were sedated possibly on a regular basis... she wishes the gullible public to believe her 'abductor' was so special that he returned on two seperate occasions to sedate them ! A bit like Gerry's thief, who stole his wallet ONLY to return it containing 30Euro...
http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann/Discrepancies-by-Topic/Sedatives-1-933839.html
Pat Brown refers to Kates book:
Kate McCann has a new book out, Madeleine, an incredible self-serving propaganda pieces which leads me to believe she must have read my letter (below from October 4, 2007).
But, as can happen to people who may have a narcissistic personality disorder, they just don't know when to SHUT UP.
For, in the book, Kate's explanations further lead me to doubt the McCann's claims of innocence in the disappearance of their daughter.
One simple example is the most peculiar speculation of Kate that all her children may have been drugged by Madeleine's 'abductor' both the night she went missing and the previous night.
First of all, Kate, this would serve no purpose to the 'abductor' except to waste time and it would be difficult to accomplish.
You must know that, so the only rational reason you are claiming the children were drugged would be to explain away the fact that, indeed, they may have been drugged and that, indeed, the only ones likely to do this would be you and Gerry
http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2011/05/criminal-profiling-topic-of-day-did.html
http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann/Discrepancies-by-Topic/Sedatives-1-933839.html
Pat Brown refers to Kates book:
Kate McCann has a new book out, Madeleine, an incredible self-serving propaganda pieces which leads me to believe she must have read my letter (below from October 4, 2007).
But, as can happen to people who may have a narcissistic personality disorder, they just don't know when to SHUT UP.
For, in the book, Kate's explanations further lead me to doubt the McCann's claims of innocence in the disappearance of their daughter.
One simple example is the most peculiar speculation of Kate that all her children may have been drugged by Madeleine's 'abductor' both the night she went missing and the previous night.
First of all, Kate, this would serve no purpose to the 'abductor' except to waste time and it would be difficult to accomplish.
You must know that, so the only rational reason you are claiming the children were drugged would be to explain away the fact that, indeed, they may have been drugged and that, indeed, the only ones likely to do this would be you and Gerry
http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2011/05/criminal-profiling-topic-of-day-did.html
